SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(SC) 95

M.P.THAKKAR, E.S.VENKATARAMIAH
Chenchu Rami Reddy – Appellant
Versus
Govt. of A. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
C.S.VAIDYANATHAN, P.P.Rao, R.VENKATARAMANA

Judgment

THAKKAR, J.:- More often than not detriment to what belongs to many collectively, does not cause pangs to any, for no one is personally hurt directly. That is why public officials and public minded citizens entrusted with the care of public property have to show exemplary vigilance. What is true of public property is equally true of property belonging to religious or charitable institutions or endowments. The facts of the present case involving the sale of lands which have been sanctioned to be sold for about Rs. 20 lakhs by private negotiations, instead of by public auction, which the appellants are prepared to purchase for about Rs. 80 lakhs, illustrate this point in a telling manner. Background : The legality and validity of a Government Order according permission to "Bugga Math", Tirupathi, a religious endowment, in exercise of powers under proviso to cl. (c) of sub-sec. (1) of S. 74 of Andhra Pradesh Charitable and Hindu Religious Institutions and Endowments Act. 1966 (Act) to sell certain lands belonging to the Math by private negotiations to Respondents 5 to 24, at the price of Rs. 62,500 per acre has been questioned by the Appellants. The impugned order, in so far a
















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top