R.S.PATHAK, SABYASACHI MUKHARJEE
Patnak And Company LTD. – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner Of Income Tax. Orissa – Respondent
Judgment
PATHAK, J.:- This appeal by special leave is directed against the judgment of the High Court of Orissa and raises the famiIiar question whether a loss suffered by the assessee is a capital loss or a revenue loss.
2. The assessee deals in automobiles and also sells spare motor parts. For the assessment year 1963-64, the relevant accounting period being the year ended March 31, 1963, the assesses claimed a loss of Rs. 53,650/- sustained by it on disposing of subscription to the Orissa Government Floated Loan 1972. It claimed that the loss suffered by it was revenue loss and, therefore, deductible against its profits for the year. The Income-tax Officer disallowed the loss in the view that it was a capital loss. The assessees appeal was dismissed by the Appellate Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax. But on second appeal the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal accepted the contention of assessee that the subscription to the Government Loan was conducive to its business and the loss arose in the course of the business, and that, therefore, the assessee was entitled to a deduction of the loss claimed by it. The Accountant Member and the Judicial Member wrote separate but concurrent ord
relied on : India Cements Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax
Commissioner of Income Tax v. Meenakshi Mills Ltd
Commissioner of Income Tax v. Madan Gopal Radhey Lal
Hooghly Trust (Pvt.) Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax
Commissioner of Income Tax v. Imperial Chemical Industries (India) Ltd
Aluminium Corpn. of India Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.