SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(SC) 218

R.S.PATHAK, SABYASACHI MUKHARJEE
Patnak And Company LTD. – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner Of Income Tax. Orissa – Respondent


Advocates:
A.Subhashini, D.C.Taneja, GOVIND DAS, P.K.Bhatnagar, P.K.Juneja, P.N.MISHRA, V.S.DESAI

Judgment

PATHAK, J.:- This appeal by special leave is directed against the judgment of the High Court of Orissa and raises the famiIiar question whether a loss suffered by the assessee is a capital loss or a revenue loss.

2. The assessee deals in automobiles and also sells spare motor parts. For the assessment year 1963-64, the relevant accounting period being the year ended March 31, 1963, the assesses claimed a loss of Rs. 53,650/- sustained by it on disposing of subscription to the Orissa Government Floated Loan 1972. It claimed that the loss suffered by it was revenue loss and, therefore, deductible against its profits for the year. The Income-tax Officer disallowed the loss in the view that it was a capital loss. The assessees appeal was dismissed by the Appellate Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax. But on second appeal the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal accepted the contention of assessee that the subscription to the Government Loan was conducive to its business and the loss arose in the course of the business, and that, therefore, the assessee was entitled to a deduction of the loss claimed by it. The Accountant Member and the Judicial Member wrote separate but concurrent ord










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top