SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
V.D. TULZAPURKAR AND D.P. MADON, JJ.
Ambalal Manibhai Patel, Appellant
Versus
State of Gujarat and another, Respondents.
Civil Appeal No......... of 1986 (arising out of S.L.P. (Civil) No. 5444 of 1981)
Decided on 5-3-1986.
Constitution of India – Article 226 and 19 – Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1957 – Section 15 – Special Civil Application - Notification issued by Government - Gujarat Minor Mineral (Second Amendment) Rules, 1976 – Appellant had filed in Gujarat High Court a writ petition Constitution being Special Civil Application challenging validity of Notification issued by Government of Gujarat in exercise of power Government of Gujarat made Gujarat Minor Mineral (Second Amendment) Rules, 1976, enhancing rate of dead rent payable by holders of quarry leases appellants writ petition was dismissed by a learned single Judge of High Court appellant filed a Letters Patent Appeal against said order of dismissal being Letters Patent Appeal – Held, Appellants Letters Patent Appeals as also those writ petitions were heard and disposed of by a common judgment reported as Gujarat holding both said Notifications Government of Gujarat issued a Circular directing that said judgment of High Court royalty would continue to be charged at rates specified in Notification have in our aforesaid judgment reversed said decision of Gujarat High Court in Smt. Sonbais case present Appeal contention of Appellant is that what was challenged before High Court in Smt. Sonbais case was enhancement of dead rent made by Notification and High Court could not quash said Notification in its entirety that is to say it could not quash also that part of said Notification which reduced rates of royalty – Appellant has also challenged validity of said Circular Government of Gujarat – Appeal allowed.
JUDGMENT
ORDER:— The above Petition for Special Leave to Appeal was heard along with Writ Petns. Nos. 1656 of 1981 etc.- D.K. Trivedi & Sons v. State of Gujarat and Civil Appeals Nos. 706 of 1981 etc. - Ambalal Manibhai Patel v. State of Gujarat, (reported in AIR 1986 SC 1323). All those Writ Petitions and Civil Appeals were disposed by a judgment delivered by us today. In view of our said judgment leave to appeal is granted in the above Petition and printing and preparation of the appeal record are dispensed with.
2. The Appellant had filed in the Gujarat High Court a writ petition under Art. 226 of the Constitution being Special Civil Application No. 138 of 1978, challenging the validity of the Notification dated April 6, 1967, issued by the Government of Gujarat in the exercise of the power under S. 15(1) of the Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1957, whereby the Government of Gujarat made the Gujarat Minor Mineral (Second Amendment) Rules, 1976, enhancing the rate of dead rent payable by the holders of quarry leases. The appellants writ petition was dismissed by a learned single Judge of the High Court. Thereupon, the appellant filed a Letters Patent Appeal against the said order of dismissal being Letters Patent Appeal No. 62 of 1978. While the said Letters Patent Appeal was pending, the Government of Gujarat issued a Notification dated March 26, 1979, whereby it made the Gujarat Minor Minerals (Amendment) Rules, 1979, reducing the rates of royalty in respect of all minor minerals to a uniform rate of ten paise per metric tonne and enhancing the rates of dead rent. Several writ petitions were filed in the High Court challenging the validity of the said Notification dated March 26, 1979, so far as the enhancement of the dead rent was concerned. The Appellants Letters Patent Appeals as also those writ petitions were heard and disposed of by a common judgment reported as Smt. Sonbai Pentalji v. State of Gujarat, (1980) 2 (21) 2 Guj LR 530 holding both the said Notifications dated April 6, 1976, and March 26, 1979, to be ultra vires S. 15 of the said Act, and Art. 19(1)(g) of the Constitution. Thereupon the Government of Gujarat issued a Circular dated February 12, 1981, directing that in view of the said judgment of the High Court royalty would continue to be charged at the rates specified in the Notification dated October 29, 1975. We have in our aforesaid judgment reversed the said decision of the Gujarat High Court in Smt. Sonbais case. In that judgment we have upheld the validity of the Notification dated March 26, 1979, but have held that the Notification dated April 6, 1976 is bad in law but on a wholly different ground, namely, that it violates the prohibition contained in the proviso to S. 15(3) of the said Act.
3. In the present Appeal, the contention of the Appellant is that what was challenged before the High Court in Smt. Sonbais case was the enhancement of dead rent made by the said Notification dated March 26, 1979, and the High Court, therefore, could not quash the said Notification in its entirety, that is to say, it could not quash also that part of the said Notification which reduced the rates of royalty. The Appellant has also challenged the validity of the said Circular dated February 12, 1981, issued by the Government of Gujarat.
4. As we have in our aforesaid judgment upheld the validity of the said Notification dated March 26, 1979, and further held that the directions contained in the said Circular dated February 12, 1981, are invalid and inoperative, the present Appeal requires to be allowed.
5. We, accordingly allow the Appeal and restrain the State of Gujarat and its officers from acting upon the directions contained in the said Circular dated February 12, 1981, and further direct the State of Gujarat to collect royalty and dead rent in accordance with the provisions of the Notification dated March. 26, 1979, for the period commencing from April 1, 1979, and ending on June 1981, nam
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.