SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(SC) 121

M.M.DUTT, R.B.MISRA
Maiku – Appellant
Versus
Vilayat Hussain Through Lrs – Respondent


Advocates:
M.A.KHAN, MANOJ SVARUP, R.K.JAIN, SHAKEEL AHMAD SYED, U.S.Prasad

JUDGMENT

R. B. MISRA, J. :— The only question for consideration in this appeal by special leave is whether the deposit of arrears of rent under S. 7C of the United Provinces (Temporary) Control of Rent and Eviction Act, 1947 will save the tenant from the penalty of being evicted for non-payment of rent.

2. The appellant is a tenant of the respondent on a monthly rent of Rs. 6.25 per mensem. He fell into arrears of rent amounting to Rs. 318.75 for the period from Ist October, 1959 to 31st December, 1963. The tenant did not pay the aforesaid amount in spite of the verbal demand. Consequently, the landlord served upon the tenant a notice of demand. The tenant, however, failed to comply with the said notice, hence he became a defaulter. The landlord thereafter served another notice on the tenant under S. 106 of the Transfer of Property Act. The tenant, however, neither vacated the premises nor cleared the arrears of rent. The landlord was, therefore, obliged to file a suit. He, however, claimed a sum of Rs. 176.68 as arrears of rent for the period from Ist October, 1961 to 8th February, 1964 the claim for rent for the remaining period having become barred by time. He also claimed a sum





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top