SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(SC) 134

K.N.SINGH, O.CHHINNAPPA REDDY
S. Govindaraju – Appellant
Versus
Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation – Respondent


Advocates:
D.K.GARG, DIPA, G.B.PAI, N.D.B.RAJU, R.K.GARG, V.LAKSHMI NARAYANA, VINIT KUMAR

JUDGMENT

SINGH, J.:— Special leave to appeal is granted.

2. This appeal is directed against the order of the High Court of Karnataka dismissing the respondents, writ petition under Art. 226 of the Constitution challenging the order of termination of service on the ground that it was violative of S. 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

3. Briefly the facts giving rise to this appeal are that the appellant was selected for appointment as Conductor in the Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation constituted under the Transport Act, 1950, his name was placed on the select list prepared by the Selection Committee constituted under the Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation (Cadre and Recruitment) Regulation 1982. He was not given a regular appointment but he was appointed to work as conductor in temporary vacancy. He continued to work for a period of more than 240 days. While he was working as conductor his services were terminated by the Order dt. 2-4/5 of 1985 on the ground of his being found unsuitable for the post. The termination order further directed that the appellant would forfeit his chance for appointment in terms of selection and his name shall stand deleted from th










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top