JUDGMENT

SINGH, J. :— This appeal is directed against the order of the High Court of Allahabad (Lucknow Bench) dismissing the appellants writ petition made under Art. 226 of the Constitution challenging the Order dt. 2-9-1983 reverting. the appellant from the post of Commercial Officer to that of Superintendent.

2. The appellant joined service in Kisan Sahkari Chini Mills Ltd., Bisalpur District Pilibhit, a sugar factory run and managed by the Uttar Pradesh Co-operative Mills Federation. While the appellant was working as Office Superintendent, he was selected for promotion to the post of Commercial Officer and by Order dt. August 29, 1980 appointed on probation for one year against a regular vacancy with a condition that his probationary period may be extended further and during the period of probation he could be reverted to the post of Office Superintendent without any notice. On 2-7-1981 the appellant was transferred from Bisalpur to Majohla Sugar Factory where he continued to work as Commercial Officer. By an Order dt. 2-10-1981 the appellants probationary period was extended for one year till 4-9-1982, the period so extended expired on 4-9-82 but no further order either extending the probationary period or confirming him on the post was issued, and the appellant continued to work as Commercial Officer. The Managing Director of the U. P. Co-operative Sugar Mill Federation Ltd. a "Co-operative society" registered under the U. P. Co-operative Societies Act, 1965, which runs and manages a number of sugar factories in the State of Uttar Pradesh issued order on 2-9-81 (1983?) reverting the appellant to the post of Office Superintendent. The appellant challenged the validity of the reversion order before the High Court on the sole ground that on the expiry of the probationary period he stood confirmed, and he could not be reverted treating him on probation. The High Court held that on the expiry of the probationary period the appellant could not be deemed to be confirmed as there was no rule prohibiting the extension of probationary period.

3. The U. P. Co-operative Institutional Service Board constituted by the State of Uttar Pradesh in accordance with sub-sec. (2) of S. 122 of the U. P. Co-operative Societies Act, 1965 has framed the U. P. Co-operative Societies Employees Service Regulations 1975 which regulate the condition of service of employee of all the co-operative societies placed under the purview of the Institutional Service Board by the Government Notification No. 366-C/XIIC-3-36-71 dt. March 4, 1972. These regulations contain provisions for recruitment, probation, confirmation, seniority and disciplinary control. Regulation 17 provides for probation, it lays down that all persons on appointment against regular vacancies shall be placed on probation for a period of one year. Proviso to the Regulation lays down that the appointing authority may, in individual cases, extend the period of probation in writing for further period not exceeding one year, as it may deem fit, Clause (ii) of the Regulation provides that if, at any time, during or at the end of the period of probation or the extended period of probation, it appears to the appointing authority that the employee placed on probation, has not made sufficient use of the opportunity offered to him, or has otherwise failed to give satisfaction, he may be discharged from service, or reverted to the post held by him substantively, if any, immediately before such appointment. Regulation 18 provides for confirmation of an employee on the satisfactory completion of the probationary period. Regulations 17 and 18 read together, provide that appointment against a regular vacancy is to be made on probation for a period of one year, this probationary period can be extended for a period of one year more. The proviso to Regulation 17 restricts the power of the appointing authority in extending period of probation beyond the period of one year. An employee appointed against a regu