SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(SC) 90

R.S.PATHAK, SABYASACHI MUKHARJEE
Niranjan And Company Private LTD. – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner Of Income Tax, W. B. -I – Respondent


Advocates:
A.SUBASHINI, ARUN JAIN, ASHOK MATHUR, C.M.Lodha, V.S.DESAI

JUDGMENT

SABYASACHI MUKHARJI, J. :— This appeal by special leave is directed against the judgment and order dated 21st May, 1971 of the Division Bench of the Calcutta High Court (reported in 1973 Tax LR 1533).

2. This appeal raises the familiar problem whether there are grounds for reopening a completed assessment but that question arises under rather peculiar circumstances. The assessment year concerned is 1962-63. The assessee/ appellant had filed its return in November, 1962 showing an income of Rs. 2,092/- as its profit. According to the assessee/appellant, a mistake had occurred in the preparation of the return, inasmuch as the profit of Rs. 10,718.46 arising from construction works had been left out from the return. But it appears that along with the original return, a copy of the Balance-sheet and Profit and Loss Account was filed by the appellant. In the Profit and Loss Account, the profit from construction work was indicated. The Income-tax Officer made an assessment on 27th November, 1963 and it appears from the assessment order that the profit from the construction work was taken into account in making the assessment. The assessee/appellant, however, filed a revised retur























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top