E.S.VENKATARAMIAH, V.KHALID
Bal Kishan – Appellant
Versus
Om Parkash – Respondent
JUDGMENT
VENKATARAMIAH, J.:— The Ist Respondent Om Parkash is the landlord of a building situated in Ferozpur Jhirka, District Gurgaon in. the State of Haryana. He had leased out the said premises in favour of one Musadi Lal for a commercial purpose. After Musadi Lal took the premises on lease he sublet the premises in favour of Med Ram - Respondent No. 2 without the written consent of the landlord Om Parkash. Thereupon Om Parkash filed a petition for eviction against Musadi Lal and Med Ram before the Rent Controller, under the provisions of the Haryana Urban (Control of Rent and Eviction) -Act, 1973 (Act No. 11 of 1973) (hereinafter referred to as the Act) on the ground, mentioned in Section 13(2)(ii)(a) of the Act which entitled the landlord to file a petition for eviction where the tenant had after the commencement of the Act without the written consent of the landlord transferred his right under the lease or sublet the building. Musadi Lal and Med Ram the tenant and the alleged sub-tenant respectively were impleaded as the respondents to the petition. During the pendency of the petition Musadi Lal died. Thereupon Bal Kishan, the appellant herein, filed an application before the
No cases in the provided list are explicitly identified as overruled, reversed, or explicitly treated as bad law. While many references cite the case of Bal Kishan v. Om Parkash, there is no indication within the provided snippets that any case has been explicitly overruled or discredited in subsequent decisions. The references to Bal Kishan appear to be in the context of following or interpreting its principles, rather than criticizing or overruling it.
Several entries indicate that subsequent decisions have followed or reiterated the principles established in Bal Kishan v. Om Parkash (AIR 1986 SC 1952). For example:
Ralli VS Satinderjit Kaur - 1997 0 Supreme(P&H) 1467, RAGHUNATH DEY ALIAS RAY (DEAD) AFTER HIM SMT. PUSPA DUTTA VS MAHAMMAD USMAN KHAN - 2002 0 Supreme(Ori) 464, Girraj Prasad VS Rishikesh - 2004 0 Supreme(Raj) 933, SHYAM SUNDAR BAZAZ VS SANWARMAL JALAN - 2005 0 Supreme(Jhk) 20, Prem Singh (Deceased) Through his LR. s VS Savitri Devi - 2006 0 Supreme(Raj) 955, Vipan Kumar VS Asha Lata Ahuja - 2009 0 Supreme(P&H) 1018, NITIN AGGARWAL VS SANTOSH AGGARWAL - 2014 0 Supreme(UK) 79, Harpal Singh (Dead) Through Lrs VS Rajinder Kaur - 2014 0 Supreme(P&H) 1693, Hemlata Devi VS Ramautar Sao - 2015 0 Supreme(Jhk) 656, Hemlata Devi VS Ramautar Sao - Current Civil Cases (2015), B. S. Leelavathi (Since Dead) By Her L. R. VS Mahadevaiah - 2016 0 Supreme(Kar) 646, Vishweshwar son of Yashwantrao Zade VS Uttam son of Sakharam Dethe since dead - 2018 0 Supreme(Bom) 1616, Prabha Devi VS Brijeswar Singh - 2019 0 Supreme(All) 863, Shakuntala Devi, W/o. Late Mohan VS Girja Prasad Gupta, S/o. Late Ramdev - 2022 0 Supreme(Chh) 496
These references explicitly mention that the Supreme Court or other courts have followed or reiterated the view taken in Bal Kishan.
This indicates that the case has been treated as good law and authoritative in subsequent rulings.
A few entries suggest that the judgments in Bal Kishan and Vidyawati cases are distinguishable in certain contexts:
Pradeep Kumar (Deceased) through his Legal Heirs VS Rakesh Ahuja - 2021 0 Supreme(HP) 29 states: "The judgments of Bal Kishan case and Vidyawati case are clearly distinguishable."
This indicates that in some decisions, courts have considered the cases as not directly applicable or have distinguished their facts or legal principles, but this does not negate the validity of Bal Kishan overall.
Some references imply that the case has been considered in different contexts, such as:
Infant Advertising Pvt. Ltd. VS K. B. Yellappa Reddy, Since Deceased by Lrs. - 2018 0 Supreme(Kar) 32, Francisco Joaquim Mesquita VS Laxmibai Pandurang Kamat - 2018 0 Supreme(Bom) 2565, RAVINDRANATH MANE S/O LATE J. ATHMARAM MANE, SINCE DECEASED BY HIS LRs. VS MEERA SATYANANDA NIKAM W/O SRI SATYANANDA NIKAM - 2021 0 Supreme(Kar) 410, Shakuntala Devi, W/o. Late Mohan VS Girja Prasad Gupta, S/o. Late Ramdev - 2022 0 Supreme(Chh) 496
These mention the case in relation to interpreting specific rules or principles, but do not indicate that the case has been questioned or overruled.
Cases where treatment is not explicitly clear or where the references are merely citing the case without indicating the court's stance:
P. N. CHOPRA VS SHARDA DEVI - 1995 0 Supreme(Del) 867, Damayanthi VS Venkateshwara Exhibitors - 2000 0 Supreme(Kar) 688, Abdul Razak (D) Through L. Rs. VS Mangesh Rajaram Wagle - 2010 0 Supreme(Raj) 21, MUNNA LAL VS CHIRONJILAL - 2006 0 Supreme(MP) 875, Sheetal Parshad (deceased through LRs) VS Rameshwar Parshad Jain - 2017 0 Supreme(P&H) 1904, SHANKARAPPA (DECEASED) BY HIS L. RS VS BASAWARAJAPPA - 2007 0 Supreme(Kar) 155, Ramesh Sethi VS Vinod Kumar Kataria - 2007 0 Supreme(MP) 216, MANJU PARTHI VS ROHIT PARTHI - 2007 0 Supreme(Del) 2575, Hakam Singh VS Isham Singh - 2009 0 Supreme(P&H) 870, Vipan Kumar VS Asha Lata Ahuja - Current Civil Cases (2009), Vipan Kumar VS Asha Lata Ahuja - 2009 0 Supreme(P&H) 1018, Infant Advertising Pvt. Ltd. VS K. B. Yellappa Reddy, Since Deceased by Lrs. - 2018 0 Supreme(Kar) 32, Francisco Joaquim Mesquita VS Laxmibai Pandurang Kamat - 2018 0 Supreme(Bom) 2565, Mahesh Kumar Trivedi, Son of late Pandit Ramagya Trivedi VS Kamala Prasad - 2018 0 Supreme(Sikk) 46, Sandip Ganesh Ghatwal Son of Late Ganesh Arjun Ghatwal VS Gurudas Arjun Ghatwal Son of Late Ganesh Arjun Ghatwal - 2016 0 Supreme(Bom) 1366, Neela VS Raja alias Rajapan - 2017 0 Supreme(Mad) 240, Swadhinlata Das VS Lingaraj Swain - 2017 0 Supreme(Ori) 275, Gulena Begum VS Azad Ali - 2017 0 Supreme(Gau) 526, Joginder Kaur VS Bhag Singh - 2018 0 Supreme(P&H) 1835, B. S. Leelavathi (Since Dead) By Her L. R. VS Mahadevaiah - 2016 0 Supreme(Kar) 646, Balmiki Prasad Singh VS Tarun Kumar - 2016 0 Supreme(Pat) 1409, Vishweshwar son of Yashwantrao Zade VS Uttam son of Sakharam Dethe since dead - 2018 0 Supreme(Bom) 1616, Prabha Devi VS Brijeswar Singh - 2019 0 Supreme(All) 863, Gopaldas And Co, Mazgaon, Mumbai VS Gopaldas Corporation, Mumbai - 2020 0 Supreme(Bom) 75, Udit Kanoi VS H. P. State Industrial Development Corporation Ltd. - 2012 0 Supreme(HP) 138, NITIN AGGARWAL VS SANTOSH AGGARWAL - 2014 0 Supreme(UK) 79, Harpal Singh (Dead) Through Lrs VS Rajinder Kaur - 2014 0 Supreme(P&H) 1693, Hemlata Devi VS Ramautar Sao - 2015 0 Supreme(Jhk) 656, Hemlata Devi VS Ramautar Sao - Current Civil Cases (2015), RAVINDRANATH MANE S/O LATE J. ATHMARAM MANE, SINCE DECEASED BY HIS LRs. VS MEERA SATYANANDA NIKAM W/O SRI SATYANANDA NIKAM - 2021 0 Supreme(Kar) 410, Shakuntala Devi, W/o. Late Mohan VS Girja Prasad Gupta, S/o. Late Ramdev - 2022 0 Supreme(Chh) 496
These are primarily citations or references to Bal Kishan without explicit mention of treatment as overruled, distinguished, or criticized.
The dominant pattern is that Bal Kishan v. Om Parkash (AIR 1986 SC 1952) is treated as good law, with many subsequent decisions following or reiterating its principles.
There are some mentions of distinguishing or not applying the case in certain contexts, but no explicit overruling or negative treatment is evident from the provided snippets.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.