SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(SC) 268

M.P.THAKKAR, S.NATARAJAN
State Of U. P. – Appellant
Versus
Ranjha Ram – Respondent


JUDGMENT

NATARAJAN, J.:— These three Appeals by Special Leave by the State of Uttar Pradesh are directed against a common judgment rendered by the Allahabad High Court in Criminal Appeal No. 896 of 1975, Referred Case No. 35 of 1975 and connected Criminal Appeals Nos. 892 and 893 of 1975. For the sake of convenience we will refer to the respondents in the three appeals in the order of their array in the Sessions Court. The respondents in the three appeals are respectively Accused 1, 16 and 2; Accused 3 to 12 and 17 to 19; and Accused 13 to 15.

2. All the 19 accused were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Kumaun for offences punishable under Sections 302 read with Sections 149, 396, 201 read with Sections 149,148 and 147, Indian Penal Code. Accused 1, 2 and 16 were sentenced to death and the rest of the accused were sentenced to imprisonment for life for the conviction under Section 302 read with Section 149, I.P.C. For the conviction under Section 396, I.P.C., all the accused except accused 13 to 15 were sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 500. For the convictions under Sections 147, 148 and 201 read with Section 149, I.P.C., no seperate sentences were awarded. The 19 accused pr

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top