SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(SC) 353

K.N.SINGH, M.P.THAKKAR
Surinder Singh – Appellant
Versus
Central Government – Respondent


Advocates:
A.MINOCHA, KAILASH VASUDEV, NAUNIT LAL, P.R.RAMASESHESH.S.PARIHARHAR, RAJINDER SACHAR, VINA MINOCHA

JUDGMENT

SINGH, J.:— This appeal is directed against the judgment of a Division Bench of Punjab and Haryana High Court setting aside order of a single Judge and also the Order made by the Central Govt. granting extension of time to the appellant to deposit purchase price in connection with the auction sale dated August 24, 1959 held in appellants favour, and directing the Rehabilitation Department, to take further proceedings regarding auction sale held in favour of the respondents.

2. Plot No. 168 situate in Jalandhar City, an evacuee property was, included, in the compensation pool under Sec. 14 of the Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act, 1954. This plot was put to auction sale on August 24, 1959. The appellant who was displaced person made the highest bid of Rs. 20,000/-, it was provisionally accepted and he deposited 1/5th of the amount at the conclusion of the auction, but he failed to deposit the balance amount. The Managing Officer therefore cancelled the auction sale. On a Revision Petition filed by the appellant, the Chief Settlement Commissioner by his Order dated March 30, 1968 set aside the Order of the Managing Officer and allowed time to the appella

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top