A.P.SEN, B.C.RAY
Parvati – Appellant
Versus
Fatehsinhrao Pratapsinhrao Gaekwad – Respondent
JUDGMENT
RAY, J. :— This appeal on special leave is against the judgment and decree made on October 4, 1971 in S.A. No. 313/63 by the High Court of Gujarat whereby it was held that in view of the retrospective effect given by virtue of the notification issued under Sec. 88(1)(b) of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 the provisions of the said Tenancy Act was not applicable in respect of lands within the municipal limits of the city of Baroda and as such the civil court was competent to determine the reasonable rent in respect of the lands in question taken settlement of by the defendant on the basis of the Kabuliyat executed on 2nd June, 1956 for a period of three years from 1956 to 1958.
2. The admitted facts of this case are that the defendant Kashiram Jaiswal, since deceased, took possession of the lands measuring 20 acres 27 gunthas in S.No. 707 of Baroda Kasba situated behind Kirti Mandir in the city of Baroda from the respondent by executing a Kabuliyat dated June 2, 1956 for a period of three years from 1956 to 1958 at an annual rent of Rs. 2225/-. The said Kabuliyat was however not registered. The defendant paid in total a sum of Rs. 970.31 in respect of arr
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.