SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1987 Supreme(SC) 689

SABYASACHI MUKHARJEE, G.L.OZA
A. K. Subbaiah – Appellant
Versus
State of Karnataka – Respondent


Advocates:
A.K.PANDEY, L.R.SINGH, M.VIRAPPA

JUDGMENT

OZA, J.-Leave granted.

2. This appeal has been preferred by the appellant who are the accused persons in a complaint filed by the State Government before the Principal Sessions Court, Bangalore. It is alleged that this complaint is filed by the State Government under Section 500 of the Indian Penal Code. This complaint was filed by the State Government on the basis of a sanction granted by the State Government under Section 199(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, as one of the persons defamed is the Director General of Police, State of Karnataka.

3. The trial court after the filing of the complaint took cognizance of the matter and issued process against the petitioners who were the accused persons before the court below. Against this issue of process, these petitioners filed a criminal revision before the High Court of Karnataka seeking the relief of quashing of the order directing issue of process and also the quashing of proceedings pending in the court below. The revision which was filed in the High Court was filed under Sections 397 and 401. In addition to the State Government, the petitioners joined respondent 2, the Director General of Police, State of Karnataka and





































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top