SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1987 Supreme(SC) 361

A.P.SEN, B.C.RAY
Pushkar Nath Nehru – Appellant
Versus
Administrator (Now By Executive Officer) , Municipality, Srinagar – Respondent


Judgement

SEN, J. :- This appeal on certificate directed against the judgment and order of the Jammu & Kashmir High Court dated September 29, 1961 raises a question as to whether the late Shri B. N. Nehru, father of the present appellants, (hereinafter referred to as the petitioner) was entitled to pension under sub-s. (3) of S. 28 of the Jammu & Kashmir Municipal Act, Samvat 1998, as amended by the Jammu & Kashmir Municipal (Amendment) Act, Samvat 2008, read with R. 5 of the Jammu & Kashmir Pension Rules. 1951.

2. The facts leading up to the appeal are as follows, On January 1, 1925 the petitioner was appointed to be the salaried President of the Municipal Committee, Srinagar. He continued to function as such till August 14. 1939 when he was abruptly removed from his office by an Order-in-Council dated August 8, 1939 on the ground of gross inefficiency. culpable negligence and deliberate evasion of responsibility. His appeal as well as the review to His Highness the Maharaja of Kashmir were withheld by Ramchandra Kak. the then Chief Secretary and he dismissed the same. In 1945 the petitioner brought Civil Suit No. 17 of Samvat 2002 in the Court of the District Judge for declaration


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top