SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
A.P. SEN AND M.M. DUTT, JJ.
Ram Dass Ram, Petitioner
Versus
State of Bihar and another, Respondents
Writ Petn. (Criminal) No. 519 of 1985, D/- 27-1-1987.
Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 147, 148, 323 and 324 – Constitution of India,1950 – Article 32 - Appeal Against conviction - Acquitted - Whether detention of petitioner at Central Jail Buxur is without any lawful authority - Petitioner on strength of a production warrant was transferred to District Jail to stand his trial in Sessions Case - Court of 4th Additional Sessions Judge - Petitioner was convicted by learned Additional Sessions Judge by his judgment August for having committed an offence punishable under S. 302 of Indian Penal Code and sentenced him to imprisonment for life- On appeal being preferred High Court by its judgment in Criminal Appeal allowed appeal and set aside judgment and conviction recorded by learned Additional Sessions Judge and acquitted petitioner - Despite release warrant issued by High Court petitioner was continued to be detained at District Jail since he had to stand his trial before Additional Sessions Judge in Sessions Case for having committed alleged offences – Held, Petitioner is being wrongfully detained at Central Jail Buxur without any lawful justification- As already stated he had been acquitted of charge under S- 302 of Indian Penal Code by High Court in one case and thereafter by 2nd Additional Sessions Judge of charge under Ss. 307 and 324 both read with S. 34 in another case- Thereafter there was no warrant for detaining him in jail- It is unfortunate that learned Judicial Magistrate Buxur without applying his mind to facts of case should have for mere asking issued a production warrant- petitioner has been in jail for more than eight years and even if he were to be convicted for having committed alleged offences punishable under Ss.147, 148, 323 and 324 of Indian Penal Code he would have in meanwhile served out sentence - Petition allowed
Judgment
In this petition under Art. 32 of the Constitution for grant of a writ of habeas corpus, the only question is whether the detention of the petitioner at the Central Jail, Buxur is without any lawful authority. It appears from the counter-affidavit of the Superintendent, district Jail, Arrah that the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Buxur had remanded the petitioner to the Central Jail, Buxur in the year 1978 in connection with case registered under GR 476/78 pertaining to commission of offences punishable under Ss. 147, 148, 323 and 324 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. Thereafter, the petitioner on the strength of a production warrant was transferred to the District Jail, Arrah to stand his trial in Sessions Case No. 75/79 in the Court of the 4th Additional Sessions Judge, Arrah. The petitioner was convicted by the learned Additional Sessions Judge by his judgment dated August 21, 1980 for having committed an offence punishable under S. 302 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced him to imprisonment for life. On appeal being preferred, the High Court by its judgment in Criminal Appeal No. 371/80 allowed the appeal and set aside the judgment and conviction recorded by the learned Additional Sessions Judge and acquitted the petitioner. Despite the release warrant issued by the High Court, the petitioner was continued to be detained at the District Jail, Arrah since he had to stand his trial before the 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Arrah in Sessions Case No. 86/82 for having committed alleged offences under Ss. 307 and 327, both read with S. 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The learned Sessions Judge by his judgment dated August 14, 1986 recorded an order of acquittal and directed the release of the petitioner unless he was wanted in some other case. After the disposal of these cases, the petitioner instead of being released was transferred from the District Jail, Arrah to the Central Jail, Buxur on November 30, 1986 i.e. after this Court had on November 10, 1986 issued notice to the Government, on the strength of a production warrant issued by the Judicial Magistrate, Buxur to face his trial under Ss. 147, 148, 323 and 324 of the Indian Penal Code.
2. In the facts and circumstances of the case, there can be no doubt that the petitioner is being wrongfully detained at the Central Jail, Buxur without any lawful justification. As already stated, he had been acquitted of the charge under S. 302 of the Indian Penal Code by the High Court in one case and thereafter by the 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Arrah of the charge under Ss. 307 and 324, both read with S. 34 in another case. Thereafter there was no warrant for detaining him in jail. It is unfortunate that the learned Judicial Magistrate, Buxur without applying his mind to the facts of the case, should have for the mere asking issued a production warrant. The petitioner has been in jail for more than eight years and even if he were to be convicted for having committed the alleged offences punishable under Ss. 147, 148, 323 and 324 of the Indian Penal Code, he would have in the meanwhile served out the sentence.
3. The writ petition is accordingly allowed and it is directed that the petitioner be released forthwith. The proceedings before the Judicial Magistrate, Buxur are quashed.
Petition allowed.
For Citation AIR 1987 SC 1333=1987 Cri. L.J. 1055= 1987 Supp. SCC 143 = 1987(1) JT 303 = 1987 SCC (Crl.) 669 = 1987 Crl.L.R. (SC) 616.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.