SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1987 Supreme(SC) 830

SABYASACHI MUKHARJEE, G.L.OZA
Mohammad Swalleh – Appellant
Versus
Third Additional District Judge, Meerut – Respondent


Advocates:
Ali Ahmad, D.K.GARG, GOBINDA MUKHOTY, JAYASHRI AHMED, R.K.GARG, S.S.HUSSAIN, TANVIR AHMAD

Judgment

SABYASACHI MUKHARJI, J. - This is a tenants appeal by special leave. After perusing the judgment impugned and grounds urged, we are of the opinion, that there is no substance in this appeal on merit, though there are one or two technical breaches. This is certainly not a decision which should be interfered with in the exercise of jurisdiction under Art. 136 of the Constitution by this Court. The appeal arises from the judgment and order dated 22nd Sept. 1978 of the High Court of Allahabad. The respondent No. 2 herein, Smt. Murtaza Begum filed an application under S. 3 of the U. P. (Temporary) Control of Rent and Eviction Act, 1947 being U. P. Act No. 3 of, 1947, hereinafter called the old Act, against the appellants. S. 3 of the said Act provided that subject to any order passed under sub-sec. (3) of that section, no suit shall without the permission of the District Magistrate be filed in any court against any tenant for his eviction from any accommodation except on the grounds mentioned therein. Sub-sec. (2) of S. 3 provided for revision to the Commissioner against the order of the District Magistrate. Sub-sec. (3) of S. 3, empowered the Commissioner to hear the applicatio














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top