SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1987 Supreme(SC) 398

V.BALAKRISHNA ERADI, A.P.SEN
State of Karnataka – Appellant
Versus
Shivalingaiah Alias Handigidda – Respondent


Judgment

ORDER :- The State of Karnataka has preferred this appeal by way of special leave against the judgment of the Karnataka High Court dated November 8, 1982. By the judgment, the High Court has set aside the order of acquittal recorded by the Sessions Judge, Bangalore acquitting the respondent of an offence under S. 302, Penal Code, 1860 and convicted him of having voluntarily caused simple hurt punishable under S. 323. The respondent has been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for one year.

2. The short question involved is whether the act of the respondent falls within clause Thirdly to S. 300 and therefore he is guilty of culpable homicide amounting to murder punishable under S. 302 Penal Code. The gravamen of the charge against the respondent was that after an altercation he suddenly pulled the deceased Giri Gowda by his testicles and squeezed the same as a result of which he fell down unconscious and died almost instantaneously. The testimony of Dr. T. C. Seetharam, Medical Officer, L.F. Hospital, Chennapatna shows that death was as a result of cardiac arrest resulting from shock due to injuries to the testis. The learned Sessions Judge held that the offence made o





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top