SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1987 Supreme(SC) 928

K.JAGANNATHA SHETTY, B.C.RAY
Paradise Printers – Appellant
Versus
Union Territory Chandigarh – Respondent


Advocates:
JITENDRA SHARMA, KAPIL SIBAL, N.S.DAS BEHL, P.Gaur, V.M.TARKUNDE

Judgment

JAGANNATHA SHETTY, J.:- These appeals by special leave are directed against the judgment dated April 25, 1980 of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana in Civil Writ No. 3512 of 1979 : (Reported in AIR 1981 Punj & Har 30).

2. The revised policy of allotment of industrial sites for the establishment of printing presses in Chandigarh has been called into question in the aforesaid writ petition. The printing presses are now scattered all over Chandigarh. They are situated either in residential premises or in small shops in different localities. The Chandigarh administration wanted them to be located in an industrial area. For that purpose, they earmarked forty-three sites in the industrial area phase-II. The sites are comparatively of bigger dimensions. In 1975, the authorities invited applications for allotment of those sites. Several persons submitted applications. The appellants in Appeal No. 97 of 1981 were some of them. They applied with deposit of earnest money of Rs. 1000/- each. That would be ten per cent of the premium payable for the site. All the applications were processed for final allotment. In the meantime, it is said that the appellants were called upon to deposit





































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top