SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1987 Supreme(SC) 993

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
B.C. RAY AND K. JAGANNATHA SHETTY, JJ.
Registrar of Firms, Societies and Chits, Uttar Pradesh, Appellant
Versus
M/s. Secured Investment Co., Lucknow and another, Respondents.
Civil Appeal No. 1988 of 1982, D/- 17-12-1987.

Advocates:
ANIL DEV SINGH, C.L.SAHU, L.M.SINGHVI, SHOBHA DIXIT

Headnote:

Prize Chits and Money Circulation Scheme (Banning) Act, 1978 – Scheme for investment" - Writ petition was filed by the respondent which is a partnership firm called as "M/s. Secured Investment Company"– Company mainly carries on business at Lucknow – It has branch offices at Kanpur and Bareilly – Nature of business of the company is termed as "a scheme for investment" – Question raised in this appeal is whether that scheme for investment falls within the category of prize chit as defined under the "Prize Chits and Money Circulation Scheme (Banning) Act, 1978 – Registrar of Firms, Societies and Chits was of the opinion that the scheme of the company falls within the prohibited category of prize chits as defined under the Act – So he seized all the documents of the company and also directed the concerned banks not to have accounts in relation thereto – Challenging the action of the Registrar, the company moved the High Court with a writ petition – High Court allowed the writ petition and quashed the orders made by the Registrar –Held, Before parting with the case we may, however, observe that the Registrar of the Firms while taking action against the persons or firms under the Act will take care to see that the members of the scheme are not denied of their contributions or prizes which they are legitimately entitled to, if the prize chit is allowed to run for the full term – Court have no doubt that the scheme of the company with which we are concerned is primarily for the benefit of the promoter or the company at the costs of the subscribers – This is the kind of transactions or arrangements which Study Group said that it should be banned altogether – Section 2(e) was intended to cover all such arrangements or schemes – Interpretation given by the Court should not be stultifying the underlying principle in the definition which was meant to protect people from exploitation – Court would like to emphasise that the Act was intended to ban all kinds of prize chits where persons part with their, money and risk the chance of getting prizes or gifts – Therefore, any scheme or arrangement in which a person agrees to lose or made to part a portion of his payment against the chance of getting any prize of gift should be considered as prize chit falling within the inclusive definition – Appeal allowed.

Judgement

JAGANNATHA SHETTY, J.:- This appeal by special leave is by the Registrar of Firms, Societies and Chits of the State of Uttar Pradesh and directed against the judgment and order passed by the High Court of Allahabad in Writ Petn. No. 630 of 1982 (reported in AIR 1984 All 28).

2. The said writ petition was filed by the respondent which is a partnership firm called as "M/s. Secured Investment Company" ("The Company"). The company mainly carries on business at Lucknow. It has branch offices at Kanpur and Bareilly. The nature of business of the company is termed as "a scheme for investment". The question raised in this appeal is whether that scheme for investment falls within the category of prize chit as defined under the "Prize Chits and Money Circulation Scheme (Banning) Act, 1978 (for short "the Act") The Registrar of Firms, Societies and Chits was of the opinion that the scheme of the company falls within the prohibited category of prize chits as defined under the Act. So he seized all the documents of the company and also directed the concerned banks not to have accounts in relation thereto. Challenging the action of the Registrar, the company moved the High Court with a writ petition under Art. 226 of the Constitution. The High Court allowed the writ petition and quashed the orders made by the Registrar.

3. In order to correctly appreciate the question raised in this appeal, it is better to have first the clear picture of the law governing the question. Section 3 of the Act imposes a ban not merely on promoting or conducting any prize chit or money circulation scheme, but also on participation in such chit or schemes. Section 4 makes a contravention of the provisions of S. 3 punishable with imprisonment which may extend to three years or with fine which may extend to Rs. 5,000/- or with both. Section 5 provides penalty for other offences like printing or publishing any ticket, coupon or other document for use in the prize chit or money circulation scheme with a view to promote such scheme in contravention of the Act. Section 6 deals with offences by companies. Section 7 confers power on the police officers not below the rank of an officer in charge of a police station to enter, search and seize. Section 9 provides for the forfeiture of newspapers or other publications containing prize chit or money circulation scheme. Section 11 provides exemption to certain categories of prize chits or money circulation schemes. The prize chits or money circulation schemes promoted by the State Government or any officer or authority on its behalf, or by a Company wholly owned by a State Government are exempted from the provisions of the Act.

4. Conventional Chit, has been defined under S. 2(a) and "Prize Chit" has been defined tinder S. 2(e) of the Act. Conventional chit stands excluded from the definition of prize chit, and so much so, the conventional chit remains untouched by provisions of the Act. The definition of the conventional chit is as follows :

"Section 2(a). "Conventional chit" means a transaction whether called chit, chit fund, kuri or by any other name or under which a person responsible for the conduct of the chit enters into an agreement with a specified number of persons that every one of them shall subscribe a certain sum of money (or certain quantity of grain instead) by way of periodical instalments for a definite period and that each such subscriber shall, in his turn, as determined by lot or by auction or by tender or in such other manner as may be provided for in the chit agreement, be entitled to a prize chit."

5. We may presently refer to the definition of prize chit and before that it is better to have a little bit of history of chit transactions. The words Chitty or kuri, Chit or Chit Fund appear to be the common words but with regional variations. Although there is no clear evidence to show the exact place of origin of chit fund, the available text [(i) Chit Finance by C. P. Somanath Nayar (1973); (ii) Chit




































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

SupremeToday

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top