B.C.RAY, K.JAGANNATHA SHETTY
Sunil Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Ram Parkash – Respondent
Judgement
RAY, J. :- The defendant-respondent No. 1, Ram Parkash as Karta of joint Hindu family executed on February 7, 1978 an agreement to sell the suit property bearing M.C.K. No. 238/9, in Mohalla Qanungaon at Kaithal for a consideration of Rs. 21,400/- and he received a sum of Rs. 5,000/- as earnest money. As the respondent No. 1 refused to execute the sale deed, the defendant No. 2, Jai Bhagwan instituted a suit No. 570 of 1978 in the court of Sub-Judge, 1st Class, Kaithal for specific performance of the agreement to sell and in the alternative for a decree for recovery of Rs. 10,000/-. In the said suit the appellants Nos. 1 and 2 and the respondent No. 11 who are the sons of defendant-respondent No. 1 made an application for being impleaded. This application, however, was dismissed. Thereafter the 3 sons of defendant No. 1 as plaintiffs instituted Civil Suit No. 31 of 1982 in the court of Sub-Judge, IInd Class, Kaithal for permanent injunction stating inter alia that the said property was joint Hindu Family coparcenary property of the plaintiffs and defendant No. 1; that there was no legal necessity for sale of the property nor it was an act of a good management to sell the s
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.