SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(SC) 50

S.RANGANATHAN, SABYASACHI MUKHARJEE
Nat Steel Equipment Private LTD. – Appellant
Versus
Collector Of Central Exclse – Respondent


Advocates:
K.J.JOHN, S.R.GROVER, SOLI J.SORABJI

Judgment

SABYASACHI MUKHARJI, J.:- This is a statutory appeal from the decision and order of the Customs Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal (briefly referred to as CEGAT) under S. 35L of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 (hereinafter called the Act). It appears that the appellant is a manufacturer of Hospital and Pharmaceutical Appliances and Heavy Duty Industrial Canteen Equipment. The following 14 items were classified by him under Tariff Item No. 68 of the said Act in his Classification List No. 106 dt. 27-3-1979 :

"(1) Storage Tank, (2) Cooking Range (Electric operation and gas operated), (3) Baking Oven, (4) Deep Fat Fryer, (5) Bain Mafie, (6) Sterilizing Sink, (7) Expresso Coffee Machine, (8) Steam Jacketed Vessel (Steam Operated), (9) Bread Toaster, (10) Bulk Cooker & Fryer, (11) Chappatty Plate/Chappatty Puffer and Chappatty Plate/ Puffer, (12) Dish Washing Machine, (13) Potato Pooler and (14) Masala Grinder."

2. The Assistant Collector held the view that products 2 to 14 were classifiable under Tariff Item No. 33C in view of the Explanation thereof. After giving notice the Assistant Collector demanded differential duty amounting to Rs. 1,91,622.20 for the perio













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top