SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1987 Supreme(SC) 665

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
E.S. VENKATARAMIAH AND K.N. SINGH, JJ.
Yashbir Singh and others etc. Petitioners
Versus
Union of India and others, Respondents.
Writ Petn. Nos. 9222 to 9226 of 1981, D/- 18-8-1987.
Advocates appeared
Mr. N. N. Keshwani, Mr. R. N. Keshwani and Mr. Raj Kumar Gupta, Advocates for Petitioners; Mr. Inder Mohan Lal Tandon, Petioner in person; Mr. V. C. Mahajan and Mr. G. L. Sanghi, Sr. Advocate, Mr. C. V. S. Rao, Mrs. Kitty Kumaramanglam, Mr. Randhir Jain and Mr. S. K. Bhattacharya, Advocates with them, for Respondents.

Advocates:
C.V.SUBBA RAO, G.L.SANGHI, I.M.TANDON, KITTY KUMARAMANGALAM, N.N.KESHVANI, R.N.KESHWANI, RAJ GUPTA, RANDHIR JAIN, S.K.BHATTACHARJEE, V.C.MAHAJAN

Headnote:

Constitution of India – Article 32 – Seniority - By means of these petitions the petitioners claim relief for quashing Railway Boards Circular/letter – They further claim relief for the issue of writ in the nature of mandamus restraining the respondent, Railway Authorities, from altering or issuing seniority list in pursuance of the Railway Boards Circular and to maintain the previous seniority list issued in 1968 for the purpose of promotions, confirmation and further advancement – In the Indian Railways, initial recruitment of Train Examiners, used to be made in the entry Grade D in the pay scale – Prior to recruitment to Grade D of Train Examiners was made from two sources (1) by promotion of skilled artisans working in the lower grade, (2) by direct recruitment of apprentices having completed prescribed four years training. 50 per cent of the vacancies were filled by apprentices while the remaining 50 of the vacancies used to be filled by promotion of skilled artisans –Held, Railway Board had never issued any direction for determining the petitioners seniority with reference to their date of appointment in the initial entry grade – Petitioners have failed to show that any person junior to them has been made senior to them – Their grievance is without any substance – Petitioners have asserted that in reply to the Lok Sabha questions, it was clearly stated by the Railway Administration that direct recruit Train Examiners posted on working posts before in Grade C in the scale of will not be treated senior to the Train Examiners promoted en masse with effect – In the counter-affidavit filed by the respondents it is stated that the reply to the Lok Sabha questions as contained in Annexure K to the petition is of no relevance as the said questions were not admitted at all and no reply was given by the Railway Board – It appears that the General Manager had prepared a draft reply to the Lok Sabha questions but the reply had not been finalised by the Railway Board which is the competent authority – Railway Board could have modified the draft of the reply as prepared by the General Manager but since the question was not admitted no reply was sent to the Lok Sabha – Petitioner can therefore draw no support from Annexure K to the petition – Petitions dismissed.

Judgment

SINGH J . :- By means of these petitions under Art. 32 of the Constitution the petitioners claim relief for quashing Railway Boards Circular/letter No. E(NG) I/69/PMI-180 dated 2nd July, 1970 and No. E(NG) I-80-SR6-39 dated 28th November, 1981. They further claim relief for the issue of writ in the nature of mandamus restraining the respondent, Railway Authorities, from altering or issuing seniority list in pursuance of the Railway Boards Circular dated 28th November, 1981 and to maintain the previous seniority list issued in 1968 for the purpose of promotions, confirmation and further advancement.

2. In the Indian Railways, initial recruitment of Train Examiners, used to be made in the entry Grade D in the pay scale of Rs. 100-185. Prior to 1st April, 1966 recruitment to Grade D of Train Examiners was made from two sources (1) by promotion of skilled artisans working in the lower grade, (2) by direct recruitment of apprentices having completed prescribed four years training. 50 per cent of the vacancies were filled by apprentices while the remaining 50 of the vacancies used to be filled by promotion of skilled artisans. Promotion from entry Grade D was made to next higher Grade C of Train Examiners in the pay scale of Rs. 150-225 and later these grades were revised and the scale of D Grade was raised to Rs. 180-240 and that of C Grade to Rs. 205-280. Promotion to Grade C used to be made on the basis of seniority-cum-suitability without any distinction of promotee or direct recruits. Because there was increase in the work load of Train Examiners the Railway Board took steps to re-organise the cadre of Train Examiners. With that end in view, it issued a notification on 27-10-1965 which directed that vacancies in the entry grade of Train Examiners in the scale of Rs. 120-140 should not be filled from apprentice Train Examiners up to 50 per cent as hitherto, but should exclusively be filled by prmotion of skilled artisans. It further provided that vacancies in the next higher Grade C (in the scale of Rs. 205-280) should be filled from amongst the Train Examiners working in the grade of Rs. 180-240 to the extent of 20 . The remaining 80 per cent vacancies were to be filled by direct recruitment of apprentice Train Examiners who may have successfully completed prescribed training. Paragraph 2 of the notification provided that the apprentice Train Examiners recruited on or from 1-4-1966 shall be given training for a period of 5 years and from the same date artisans recruited in the lower grade as apprentice Train Examiners shall be given in service training for a period of three years. The circular upgraded 50 of the existing posts of Train Examiners from Grade D to Grade C in the scale of Rs. 205-280 which were earlier earmarked for Apprentice Train Examiners. The notification further directed that with effect from 1-4-1966 all the apprentice Train Examiners on successful completion of their training should be straightway brought to the scale of Rs. 205-280 instead of being first absorbed in the scale of Rs. 180-240 as was being done prior to the issue of the notification. Apprentice Train Examiners who were undergoing training on the date of the issue of notification were directed to be brought to the working posts before 1-4-1966 and they were allowed stipend in the scale of Rs. 180-240 during the period of their training and their period of training was increased from four years to five years. On the completion of the training they were straightway posted in Grade C in the scale of Rs. 205-280. Those apprentice Train Examiners who had already been or may be absorbed in the scale of Rs. 180-240 up to 3l-3-1966 were directed to be accommodated first in the scale of Rs. 205-280 in Grade C against the quota of 80 vacancies reserved for them, and they were not required to undergo selection before being absorbed in that grade.

3. The effect of the Railway Boards Circular dated October 27, 1965 was that the existing apprentice















































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top