SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(SC) 126

A.P.SEN, B.C.RAY
Vidya Parkash – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent


Advocates:
C.V.SUBBA RAO, D.K.GARG, M.S.Rao, R.K.Oarg

Judgment

RAY, J. :- Special leave granted. Heard arguments of learned counsel for the parties.

2. This appeal by special leave is against the judgment and order dated 3rd March, 1986 passed by the High Court at Delhi dismissing the writ petition No. 2503 of 1985.

3. The facts of the case in brief are that the appellant was appointed to the post of Craftsman ( Jawan) on November 23, 1973. He was sent to 3 E. M. E. Centre, Bhopal for training. After completion of his two years training he was posted to 80 EME Battalion C/o 56A. P. O. on July 25,1975. The appellant in view of his good service was promoted to the post of Naik and subsequently he was confirmed in that post. During his service as Jawan and as a Naik, the appellant served at various places in the country including the field area at Punj Sector in Jammu & Kashmir. The appellant was reverted from the post of Naik to the post of Jawan (Craftsman) by Lt. Col. G. S. Srivastava and he was, thereafter, directed to report to NEFA. The appellant, joined his post in NEFA. However, the appellant was subsequently transferred and posted in Panagarh. One Major N. R. Tiwari who was the Commanding Officer of the said regiment became very mu






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top