SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1987 Supreme(SC) 969

M.N.VENKATACHALIAH, S.NATARAJAN
Raja Ram Kumar Bhargava – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent


Advocates:
A.Subhashini, F.S.NARIMAN, K.C.DUA, RANJIT GHOSAL, S.C.Manchanda, S.RAJAPPA

Judgment

VENKATACHALIAH, J. - This appeal, by special leave, by the legal representatives of Raja Ram Kumar Bhargava, the unsuccessful plaintiff, is directed against the Judgment and decree, dated 14-2-1980 of the High Court of Delhi in First Appeal (O. S.) No. 17 of 1972* on its file, affirming the judgment and decree of dismissal dated, 28-7-1972 in Suit No. 372 of 1969 entered by the learned single Judge of the High Court.

* (1983) 141 ITR 836 (Delhi).

Plaintiff sued for recovery of interest on certain refunds of Income-tax and Excess Profit Tax claimed to be statutorily due and payable to him under Section 66 (7) of the income-tax Act 1922 (hereinafter referred to as the 1922 Act) on the refunds of the taxes. The suit claim comprised of a sum of Rs. 1,17,358.87 sought by way of interest on the refund of income-tax; and Rs. 12,282. 11 claimed as representing interest on the refund of Excess Profit Tax. The assessments were made under the Income-tax Act (1922 Act) and the Excess Profit Tax Act 1940 respectively.

2. The necessary and material facts may briefly be stated :

Raja Ram Kumar Bhargava was assessed in the capacity of Kartha of a Hindu Undivided Family for Income and Excess Pr






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top