SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1987 Supreme(SC) 889

L.M.SHARMA, A.P.SEN
Thote Bhaskara Rao – Appellant
Versus
A. P. Public Service Commission – Respondent


Advocates:
ATTAR SINGH, G.N.Rao, M.K.RAMAMURTHY, T.V.S.N.Chari

Judgment

SHARMA, J. :- The appellants application for appointment as a District Munsif by the State of Andhra Pradesh in the quota reserved for Scheduled Castes was rejected by the Andhra Pradesh Public Service Commission (briefly described as the ,Commission,), respondent No. 1, which the appellant challenged before the Andhra Pradesh High Court by a writ petition. The learned single Judge allowed the prayer and directed the first respondent to consider the candidature of the appellant for the appointment in question. The respondents challenged the decision under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent in the High Court in Writ Appeal No. 22 of 1985. The appeal was allowed and the writ petition was dismissed. We have granted leave under Art. 136 of the Constitution allowing the appellant to appeal against the said decision.

2. The appointment of District Munsifs is regulated by Andhra Pradesh State Judicial Service Rules (hereinafter referred to as the Rules). In response to an advertisement issued by the ,Commission, for filling up a large number of vacancies of District Munsifs by direct recruitment, the appellant applied. Subsequently a second advertisement was issued on 27-5-1984 with r










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top