SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(SC) 101

S.RANGANATHAN, SABYASACHI MUKHARJEE
Nagar Mahapalika, Bareilly – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
PRAMOD SVARUP, R.B.MAHATO, S.N.KACKAR, SOLI J.SORABJI

Judgment

SABYASACHI MUKHARJI, J. - This petition under Art. 136 of the Constitution for leave to appeal is against the decision of the High Court of Allahabad dated 2nd of November, 1987. The question involved here is regarding the levy and realisation of octroi duty by the Nagar Mahapalika, Bareilly in Uttar Pradesh. Kasturi Lal Satantra Kumar and his partner, respondents herein, by a bid in the auction held for retail vend of country liquor for excise year 1987-88 ending on March 31, 1988 obtained the necessary licence under the U.P. Excise Act for a group of shops known as Faridpur Group in the district of Bareilly. The auction was held in the month of March, 1987. One of the conditions of the auction which also formed part of the licence, was that the licensee would obtain supply of country liquor for retail vend from the bonded warehouse in respect of Bareilly district situated within the limits of Nagar Mahapalika, Bareilly.

2. Indubitably the said Kasturi, petitioner in the original writ petition brought into the territory country spirit, the question was at what rate the municipality was to impose octroi duty on the rectified spirit which was brought.

3. It appears that there


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top