SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(SC) 217

A.P.SEN, L.M.SHARMA
Sova Ray – Appellant
Versus
Gostha Gopal Dey – Respondent


Advocates:
A.K.MAHAPATRA, A.P.MOHANTY, VINU BHAGAT

Judgment

SHARMA, J. :- The appellants filed a suit for partition of the properties detailed in the plaint claiming 1/3rd share. A preliminary decree was passed by the trial Court, which was challenged by the defendant No. 9 (original respondent No. 1 in the present appeal) before the Orissa High Court in First Appeal No. 184 of 1972. The appeal was disposed of on compromise whereby the plaintiffs claim to 1/3rd share was accepted as correct. The terms of the compromise are set out in paragraph 2 of the order dated 27-3-79. It was, however, further agreed that half of the share of the plaintiffs, i.e. 1/6th share, would go to the defendant No. 9 provided he paid a sum of Rs. 40,000/- to the plaintiffs by a particular date, failing payment within time, the decree passed by the trial Court would stand confirmed as per terms of the compromise. The compromise was recorded on 27-3-1979. According to the compromise the sum of Rs. 40,000/- was to be paid in two instalments: the first instalment of Rs. 10,000/- by 31-7-1979 and the remaining amount of Rs. 30,000/- by 28-2-1980. The first instalment was paid within time but the remaining amount was not paid. In the meantime, the decree by the


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top