SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(SC) 216

RANGANATH MISRA, M.M.DUTT
Bigyan Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent


Advocates:
A.K.GANGULY, A.Subhashini, B.PARTHASARTHY, M.K.BANERJI, P.P.Rao, PANKAJ KAIRA

Judgment

ORDER :- An application under Article 32 of the Constitution being Writ Petition No. 591 of 1987 has been filed in this Court on behalf of 40 employees working in the Pension Paying Office, Pokhara in Nepal asking for a direction to the Union of India to make the services of the petitioners permanent and for further directions in the matter of payment of allowances and other material benefits as payable to similar employees under the Union Government. Notice was ordered on the application on 14th July, 1987, and two weeks time was allowed to the respondents for filing their counter-affidavit. On 3rd August, 1987, the court directed as follows :-

"Two weeks are allowed to the respondents for filing a counter-affidavit. No further time will be allowed. One week thereafter is allowed for filing rejoinder. Put up this matter after three weeks. Meanwhile, status quo as on today shall be maintained."

(underlining is ours).

On 7th August, 1987, the Court made the following further order :-

"Issue notice returnable on August 14, 1987. Mr. B. Parathasarathy accepts the notice for Union of India.

Respondent is directed to file counter-affidavit within one week from today.

In the meanwhile
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top