SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(SC) 237

S.RANGANATHAN, SABYASACHI MUKHARJEE
Collector Of Central Excise, Madras – Appellant
Versus
Kutty Flush Doors And Furniture Company Private LTD. – Respondent


Advocates:
G.RAMASVAMY, Indu Malhotra, SUSHMA SURI

Judgment

SABYASACHI MUKHARJI, J.:- This is an appeal under Section 35L(b) of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 (hereinaftr called the Act). The appeal is directed against the Order of the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal (hereinafter called the CEGAT).

2. The respondent herein filed a classification list on 16th March, 1982 seeking approval of sawn timber and dried timber as non-excisable. The submission of the respondent was that timber logs were only sawn into sizes and these did not tantamount to any manufacture. However, the Assistant Collector, Madras, held that the conversion of timber logs into sawn timber satisfied the conditions of manufacture insofar as the conversion of timber logs into sawn-timber involves transformation whereby a new and different article with the distinct name, character or use emerges which is different from timber logs. It was held accordingly that excise duty @ 8% ad valorem under Tariff Item 68 of the erstwhile Central Excise Tariff was leviable.

3. The respondent filed an appeal before the Collector of Appeals who concurred with the Assistant Collector upholding the duty. Aggrieved thereby the respondent filed an appeal bef






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top