SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(SC) 300

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
RANGANATH MISRA AND M.M. DUTT, JJ.
Lt. Colonel K. D. Gupta, Appellant
Versus
Union of India and others, Respondents.
Civil Appeal No. 1702 of 1987, D/- 20-4-1988.

Advocates:
C.V.SUBBA RAO, K.D.Gupta, Kuldip Singh, PRAMOD SVARUP

Headnote:

Permanent Commission in the Indian Army in 1958 –Promotion - Permanent Commission in the Indian Army in 1958 and was initially appointed as a Second Lieutenant – He obtained successive promotions to the ranks of Lieutenant, Captain and Major, he was selected for promotion to the rank of acting. Lt. Colonel and was so promoted with effect – Appellant came to face a series of setbacks in his service, his Brigade Commander directed the appellant to report to the Officer Commanding, Military Hospital, Kirkee for his psychiatric examination – He was examined by Lt. Colonel Mukherjee, specialist in psychiatry and by Surgeon Commodore Dnetto, Psychiatry Consultant to the Indian Navy – On the basis of their reports, the appellants medical classification was reduced from Shape I to Shape III by order, the appellant was posted as GLO (Major/Captain) 152, G. L. Sec – Type C vice Captain I.K. Bedi, a post ordinarily held by a Major or Captain –Held, Court agree with the learned Additional Solicitor General that the subject is technical and ordinarily should be left to experts available in the Defence Department and the guidelines indicated by the Department should be followed – This Court has no intention to disturb the discipline of the Defence Department but on the basis of material available on the record which had been partly dealt with by this Court on the earlier occasion while disposing of the writ petition, and what we have now found on the basis of the request of examination by the Committee of Experts the appellant has become entitled to limited relief – Though there was no order reducing him from the rank of acting Lieutenent Colonel to Major, he was treated to have been so reduced – Then followed the frequent psychiatric examinations without any real justification – These have constituted the foundation of the appellants grievance – His recategorisation as S-II in 1978, in these circumstances, was without justification – He is, therefore, entitled to a reconsideration of his claim for promotion on the basis of his medical categorisation continuing as S-I – Appeal partly allowed.

Judgment

RANGANATH MISRA, J. : - This appeal is by special leave and is directed against the judgment of the Allahabad High Court dismissing the writ application of the appellant. He was granted a permanent Commission in the Indian Army in 1958 and was initially appointed as a Second Lieutenant. He obtained successive promotions to the ranks of Lieutenant, Captain and Major. In Dec. 1974, he was selected for promotion to the rank of acting. Lt. Colonel and was so promoted with effect from 27th Feb. 1975.

2. From the following year, the appellant came to face a series of setbacks in his service. On March 22, 1976, his Brigade Commander directed the appellant to report to the Officer Commanding, Military Hospital, Kirkee for his psychiatric examination. He was examined by Lt. Colonel Mukherjee, specialist in psychiatry on 23rd March, 1976 and by Surgeon Commodore Dnetto, Psychiatry Consultant to the Indian Navy on the 26th March, 1976. On the basis of their reports, the appellants medical classification was reduced from Shape I to Shape III by order dated August 13, 1976. By order dated Nov. 16, 1976, the appellant was posted as GLO (Major/Captain) 152, G. L. Sec. Type C vice Captain I.K. Bedi, a post ordinarily held by a Major or Captain. Though there was no specific order reducing the appellant in rank from Acting Lt. Colonel to that of Major, he was treated as Major. On Dec. 10, 1976, appellants classification was upgraded to Shape II and on a second medical review on Sept. 2, 1977 to Shape I. His authorities, however, decided the appellant to be subjected to Special Review before restoration of the rank of Acting Lt. Colonel and on Oct. 31, 1977, required the Brigadier Commander to initiate a special report and submit it to the Headquarters. The Brigade Commander recorded appreciation of the appellants work and recommended his promotion as Lt. Colonel. Yet, the Army Headquarters by letters dated Oct. 12 and Nov. 27, 1978, directed the appellant to be sent to the Military Hospital at Pune for further examination by the psychiatry consultant. It was indicated by way of justification for such requirement that when the appellant was graded as Shape I, an earlier incident of 1963 had been overlooked. On such examination the appellant was permanently downgraded as Shape II.

3. The appellant filed an application under Art. 32 being Writ Petn. No. 5302 of 1980 challenging these actions and his downgrading. A two-Judge Bench of this Court by judgment dated Aug. 10, 1983 allowed the same. This Court stated (at p 1123 of AIR) :

"According to the petitioner, this was done entirely without any basis and that even the clinical reports would reveal that the petitioner was perfectly fit. We do not desire to go into these claims of the petitioner since we are satisfied on the material placed before us that even the very reduction of the petitioners rank in 1976 from Acting Lieutenant Colonel to Major was bad.

Shri Abdul Khader, learned counsel for the respondents explained to us that the petitioner had been reverted from the rank of Acting Lieutenant Colonel to Major for three reasons :-

(i) Reduction in rank had to follow as a matter of course on placement of the petitioner in a lower medical category;

(ii) After the latest medical examination in 1978, he was not eligible to be considered for promotion for one year; his earlier reduction in rank was, therefore, justified; and

(iii) He performed no duty for six months from March 22, 1976 when he was admitted in the hospital and under the rules, he stood automatically reduced in rank".

This Court examined all the three points and ultimately ended by saying (at p 1124 of AIR) :

"As stated by us earlier, we find no substance in any one of the reasons mentioned by Shri Abdul Khader on behalf of the respondents for the reversion of the petitioner from the rank of Acting Lieutenant Colonel to Major. The reversion or reduction in rank cannot be justified and it is accordingly quashed. The petitioner is direc



































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top