SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(SC) 393

L.M.SHARMA, A.P.SEN
Moorthy – Appellant
Versus
State Of T. N. – Respondent


Advocates:
A.V.RANGAM, U.R.Lalit, V.BALACHANDRAN, V.KRISHNAMURTHY

Judgment

L. M. SHARMA, J. :- The appellant was convicted by the trial Court for double murder of a woman, Jayasambal by name and her son Vijay Anand, and was sentenced to death. He was further convicted under S. 307, I.P.C. for attempting to kill Vijay Anands sister Kavitha Priyadarsini and for house trespass in order to commit the aforesaid offences, and was sentenced to life imprisonment under each of the two counts. His appeal before the Madras High Court was dismissed and the sentence of death confirmed. The present Special Leave Petition was filed against this judgment.

2. At the preliminary hearing we are satisfied that the appellant was rightly convicted as mentioned earlier. We, however, directed notice to be issued on the question: of sentence. Accordingly, limited special leave is granted.

3. According to the case of the: prosecution, Dr. Manickasainy (P.W. 1), the husband of the deceased Jayasambal and father of deceased Vijay Anand, was a doctor working in the Government Hospital at Madras and the appellant as a Leprosy Inspector under him. The doctor had taken a second wife whom he was keeping in another house with their 3 children. The appellant developed close associati








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top