SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(SC) 379

M. H. KANIA, R. S. PATHAK
Commissioner Of Income Tax, U. P. – Appellant
Versus
Bazpur Co-operative Sugar Factory LTD. – Respondent


Advocates:
A.K.VERMA, A.Subhashini, B.B.Ahuja, JOEL PERES, K.C.DUA, S.C.Manchanda

Judgment

KANIA, J. :- This is an appeal against the judgment of a Division Bench of the Allahabad High Court in Income-tax Reference No. 67 of 1969 (reported in 1971 UPTC 813). The appeal has been filed at the instance of the Commissioner of Income-tax, U. P.

2. The relevant facts are as follows :-

The respondent (assessee) is a Co-operative Society registered under the Co-operative Societies Act, 1912. It carries on the business of manufacture and sale of sugar and runs a Mill situated at Bazpur. The relevant assessment year is the assessment year 1961-62, corresponding to the accounting year 1st July, 1959 to 30th June, 1960, which was the relevant co-operative year. The assessee had established a fund called "Loss Equalization and Capital Redemption Reserve Fund". On the opening day of the year of account, namely, 1st July, 1959, a sum of Rs. 1,30,196/-stood to the credit of this fund. During the relevant accounting year, the respondent society added a sum of Rs. 5,15,863/- to this fund by deduction from the price payable by the respondent to its members for the supply of sugarcane received from its members. These deductions were made under the provisions of bye-law 50 of the Bye-l



































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top