SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(SC) 299

S.RANGANATHAN, SABYASACHI MUKHARJEE
Collector Of Customs, Bombay – Appellant
Versus
Bhor Industries LTD. – Respondent


Advocates:
B.DUTTA, INDIRA SAWHNEY, P.P.Rao

Judgment

SABYASACHI MUKHARJ1, J. :- These appeals under Section 130E(b) of the Customs Act, 1962 (hereinafter called the Act) are against the order dated 15th December, 1986 passed by the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal (hereinafter called CEGAT). These appeals are related to a dispute regarding the duty of custom imposed on the respondent. The department had levied duty on the product known as Santicizer 429 imported by the respondent. The respondent had contested this duty and filed a claim for the refund. The Assistant Collector of Customs rejected this claim. The Assistant Collector on test found it to be organic compound (easter - type) in form of colourless viscose liquid and as per 7.0.046, should be considered as polymeric plasticiser. The Appellate Collector found that Chapter 38 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 was residuary in nature. According to him, if the item was not covered by any other chapter of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 then it would fall under Chapter 38. The Appellate Collector further found that linear polysters were covered by CCCN 39.01(E). The Appellate Collector held that the impugned goods are formed by the condensation of diabasic









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top