M.H.KANIA, K.JAGANNATHA SHETTY, O.CHHINNAPPA REDDY
Executive Engineer (Irrigation) , Balimela – Appellant
Versus
Abhaduta Jena – Respondent
Judgment
CHINNAPPA REDDY, J. :- This group of appeals raises the question of award of interest by an arbitrator to whom a reference is made without the intervention of the Court. Special leave to appeal was granted under Art. 136 of the Constitution limited to the question of award of interest during the period prior to the reference and during the pendency of the arbitration proceedings. Special leave was not granted in regard to the award of interest subsequent to the date of the arbitrators award. This question, therefore, does not concern us in these appeals.
2. The various references to arbitration in these cases were in regard to work done by different contractors in excess of what was stipulated under the several contracts. The contracts generally contained a clause to the following effect :
"Clause 11 - The Engineer-in-charge shall have power to make any alterations in or additions to the original specifications, drawings, designs, and instructions that may appear to him to be necessary or advisable during the progress of the work, and the contractor shall be bound to carry out the work in accordance with any instructions which may be given to him in writing signed by the Engi
Seth Thawardas Pherumal v. Union of India
Nachiappa Chettiar v. Subramaniam Chettiar
Firm Madanlal Roshanlal Mahajan v. Hukumchand Mills Ltd.
Union of India v. Bungo Steel Furniture Pvt. Ltd.
State of M. P. v. M/s Saith and Skelton Pvt. Ltd.
Union of India v. Mayor and Co.
Union of India v. West Punjab Factories
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.