SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(SC) 441

M.M.DUTT, RANGANATH MISRA
Narendra Nath Pandey – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent


Judgment

DUTT, J.:- These two appeals by special leave involve the interpretation of the Uttar Pradesh Non-Technical (Class-II) Services (Reservation of Vacancies for Demobilised Officers) Rules, 1973, hereinafter referred to as the 1973 Rules, and the Uttar Pradesh Non-Technical (Class-II/Group B) Services (Appointment of Demobilised Officers) Rules, 1980, hereinafter referred to as the 1980 Rules, relating to the seniority of the appellants vis-a-vis the private respondents.

2. The appellants have all been appointed in the Provincial Civil Service of the State of Uttar Pradesh as direct recruits on the basis of competitive examinations held by the Uttar Pradesh Public Service Commission. The appointments of the appellants were made under the U. P. Civil Service (Executive Branch) Rules, 1941 framed under Section 241(1)(b) of the Government of India Act, 1935, hereinafter referred to as the Service Rules.

3. The respondents were recruited under the 1973 Rules and/or the 1980 Rules. The respondents were either Emergency Commissioned Officers or the Short Service Commissioned Officers of the armed forces of the Union of India and were commissioned on or before November 1, 1962 during t
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top