SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(SC) 491

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
E.S. VENKATARAMIAH AND M.M. DUTT, JJ.
G.S. Dhara Singh, Petitioner
Versus
E.K. Thomas and others, Respondents.
Spl. Leave Petn. (Civil) No. 7586 of 1988, D/- 9-8-1988.

Advocates:
C.RAMAMURTHY, M.A.KRISHNAMURTHY, M.K.RAMAMURTHY

Headnote:

Trade Unions Act – Whether a member of a trade union is entitled to ask for an account and to claim refund of the sums received by the trade union from the management for and on his behalf on his ceasing to be a member of the said, trade union – Employees of a certain management which was the member of the Cochin Railway Forwarding Agents Association whose President is impleaded as Respondent in this petition – Management concerned was doing the business of a clearing agent in the Cochin Harbour Terminus Railways Goods Shed – Respondents 1 and 2 were working as head load workers – Some of the employees working under the management concerned were members of a trade union called Cochin Port Thozhilali Union whose General Secretary is impleaded as Respondent No. 3 in this petition – Petitioner, G. S. Dhara Singh was the President of the trade union –Held, Arrears will be paid within two months from the date of signing of the Settlement – Further, the Company shall collect from each workman an amount equivalent to 15% of the gross arrears payable to each employee under this settlement as contribution to the Union Fund and this Amount shall be paid to the Union within 3 days of the payment of arrears by Payees A/C Cheque – Appellant in the above case which was a non-recognised union had challenged the validity of clause 17, referred to above, on the ground that it permitted a compulsory exaction not permitted by the Payment of Wages Act from the arrears payable to the workmen – Court rejected the said contention since under clause 17 the amount of 15% of the gross arrears received by the Union was to be treated as contribution to the Union Fund and that the said clause was a valid one – In the case before us the petitioner and Respondent have not shown that there was any such settlement between the management and the trade union or a scheme prepared by the trade union which was binding on the workmen under which the amounts received towards the gratuity and the accident benefit fund on behalf of the workmen would become a part of the union fund – Special leave petition dismissed.

Judgment

VENKATARAMIAH, J. :- The question involved in this petition is whether a member of a trade union is entitled to ask for an account and to claim refund of the sums received by the trade union from the management for and on his behalf on his ceasing to be a member of the said, trade union.

2. Respondents 1 and 2, E. K. Thomas and K. K. Surendran respectively, were employees of a certain management which was the member of the Cochin Railway Forwarding Agents Association whose President is impleaded as Respondent No. 4 in this petition. The management concerned was doing the business of a clearing agent in the Cochin Harbour Terminus Railways Goods Shed. The respondents 1 and 2 were working as head load workers. Some of the employees working under the management concerned were members of a trade union called Cochin Port Thozhilali Union (hereafter referred to as the trade union) whose General Secretary is impleaded as Respondent No. 3 in this petition. The petitioner, G. S. Dhara Singh was the President of the trade union. The terms and conditions of service including the rates of wages and other allied matters relating to the head load workers were decided and settled through mutual negotiations between the trade union and Respondent No. 4. Under an agreement entered into in October, 1973 an amount equivalent to 10 paise out of every rupee earned by the workers was deducted by the management towards the gratuity fund and transferred to the trade union for and on behalf of the workers. Under another agreement a sum equivalent to 10 paise per rupee in the wages of the workers was paid by the management to the trade union towards accident benefit fund of which the workers were the beneficiaries. The amount so collected were entrusted to the petitioner, who was also the treasurer and custodian of the funds of the trade union. It is alleged that the petitioner deposited the amounts so received by him in his personal name in this bank account. No account of the amounts so received by him was rendered and the members of the trade union found that it was not possible to keep control over the funds so received by the petitioner. The petitioner who was the President of the trade union did not call any general body meeting and thus the members of the trade union could not ventilate their grievance regarding the mismanagement of the funds received by the petitioner by democratic means. In view of the above difficulty faced by them 85 workers including Respondents I and 2 and three others, namely, K. T. Raghavan, A. N. Joseph and K. J. Anthappan, resigned from the trade union on 13-1-1976 and formed a separate union of their own, which was registered under the Trade Unions Act. Thereafter Respondents Nos. 1 and 2, K. T. Raghavan, A. N. Joseph and K. J. Anthappan instituted five suits being Original Suits Nos. 49 to 52 and 54 of 1977 on the file of the Munsiff, Cochin against the petitioner and Respondent No. 3 praying for a decree directing the petitioner and Respondent No. 3 to render an account of the amounts collected on their behalf from December, 1969 towards the accident benefit fund and from October, 1973 towards the gratuity at the rate of 10 paise per rupee under each head and to pay the amounts due to them. Each of the plaintiffs in the said suits estimated the amount payable to him at Rs. 3000/-. They also claimed future interest at 6 per cent per annum on the amounts found to be due to them till the date of payment.

3. The petitioner, who was the President and Treasurer of the trade union took up various pleas denying his liability to render account and to refund the amount. One of the pleas raised by the petitioner was that since the plaintiffs had resigned and ceased to be the members of the trade union they had no right to claim the refund of the sums due to them from out of the funds of the trade union and that if they re-joined the trade union they would be entitled for payment of gratuity and accident benefit when occa










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top