SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1987 Supreme(SC) 276

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
A.P. SEN AND V. BALAKRISHNA ERADI, JJ.
Southern Command Military Engineering Services Employees Co-op. Credit Society, Appellant
Versus
V.K.N. Nambiar (since deceased) by legal representative Madhvi Devi, Respondent.
Civil Appeal No. 608 of 1979, D/-27-2-1987.

Headnote:REPORT SHOWING THAT THE DEMISED PREMISES NOT IN OCCUPATION OF TENANT—INFERENCE OF SUBLETTING COULD BE DRAWN—HENCE SETTING ASIDE OF DECREE OF EVICTION BY HIGH COURT NOT PROPER - Commissioners Report—DEMISED PREMISES NOT IN OCCUPATION OF TENANT BUT IN OCCUPATION OF STRANGERS AS PER REPORT OF COMMISSIONER—INFERENCE OF SUBLETTING CAN BE DRAWN—HIGH COURT REFUSING TO ACT ON SUCH REPORT—WHETHER JUSTIFIED

       -as held in the case of Southern Command Military Engineering Services Employees Co-op. Credit Society v. V.K.N. Nambiar, AIR 1988 SC 2126, the High Court was obviously in error in its view that the Commissioner’s report could not be acted upon or be treated as legal evidence. The Commissioner’s report tends to show that the demised premises are no longer in occupation of the respondent but in occupation of strangers which fact does see an inference of subletting as held by the lower Appellate Court. Thereafter the evidence of the appellant was recorded and there is no evidence that the witness examined on commission could have attended the court during the time the case was pending. Hence held that the statement of the witness examined on commission was not inadmissible.

Judgment

JUDGMENT :- After hearing learned counsel for the parties. we are satisfied that interference by the High Court with the findings of fact recorded by the lower appellate Court in exercise of its supervisory jurisdiction under Art. 227 of the Constitution was wholly unwarranted and in excess of its jurisdiction. The High Court was obviously in error in its view that the Commissioners report could not be acted upon or be treated as legal evidence. The Commissioners report tends to show that the demised premises are no longer in occupation of the respondent but in occupation of strangers which fact does se an inference of subletting as held by the lower appellate Court.

2. We accordingly allow the appeal, set aside the judgment and order of the High, Court and restore the judgment and decree passed by the lower appellate Court decreeing the plaintiffs suit for eviction. We however direct that the decree for eviction shall not be executed for a period of four months from today provided the respondent files usual undertaking in this Court within four weeks from today. No costs.

Appeal allowed.

For Citation : AIR 1988 SC 2126

Vikas Info Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top