SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(SC) 222

S.RANGANATHAN, SABYASACHI MUKHARJEE
Bihar State Housing Board State Of Bihar – Appellant
Versus
Ban Bihari Mahato – Respondent


Judgment

JUDGMENT:- Special leave granted and the appeals are disposed of hereunder.

2. In view of the peculiar facts and circumstances of these cases in respect of the entire land involved in both the appeals we are setting aside the findings of the High Court without deciding the legality of the question determined by the High Court and having regard to the facts and circumstances of these cases and in view of the public interest involved, in our opinion, the appropriate Order would be to uphold the acquisitions made already subject to the following conditions :

1. That the compensation for the said acquisitions should be paid as if the acquisitions were made as on 1-3-1988.

2. Such compensation to be determined by the Land Acquisition Collector in accordance with law within a period of six months from this date.

3. After determining such compensation, subject to any legal objections if any, the compensation should be paid to the respondents within three months thereafter.

3. The respondents will make their claims and the parties will appear on 16-4-1988 before the Special Land Acquisition Officer. Adityapur Industrial Area Development Authority, Adityapur (Jamshedpur).

4. The appeals a


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top