SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(SC) 527

SABYASACHI MUKHARJEE, L.M.SHARMA
State Of Punjab – Appellant
Versus
Om Parkash Baldev Krishan – Respondent


Advocates:
C.M.NAYAR, SUNITA RAO, T.V.S.N.Chari, VRINDA GROVER, Y.S.Chitale

Judgment

SABYASACHI MUKHARJI. :- This appeal involves a short question and the field is more or less covered by the constitutional provisions as well as the authorities of this Court. The Executive Engineer (Construction Division No. 1) PWD B & R Branch, Patiala, invited tenders for the work called "Construction of high level bridge over Tangri Nadi in Mile No. 19/5 of Patiala-Pehewa Road". The respondent in response to the said invitation submitted the tender for the aforesaid work, which was opened on 7th October, 1975. The Executive Engineer informed the respondent on that date, who happened to be the lowest tenderer and before the tender could be finally considered, that the drawings in triplicate be submitted to the Chief Engineer PWD B & R. Suptd. Engineer, PWD B & R and Executive Engineer Construction Division No. 1 PWD B & R Branch, Patiala. The tender, however, was recalled in February, 1976 by the Executive Engineer Construction Division No. 1. The respondent again submitted tender on 31st August, 1976. The Executive Engineer informed the respondent telegraphically that the tender submitted by him had been accepted and asked the respondent to take up the work in hand. This








































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top