SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(SC) 224

K.N.SINGH, M.H.KANIA
Chandu Lal Chandraker – Appellant
Versus
Puran Mal, Another – Respondent


Judgment

JUDGMENT:- The appellant is an accused in a criminal case pending before the trial court. The trial court has dispensed with the appellant personal appearance under Section 205 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and has permitted him to be represented at the trial through his counsel. On the conclusion of the trial the learned Magistrate directed the appellant to appear personally before the court for recording his statement as contemplated by Section 313 of the Code. The appellants request that his statement may be recorded through his counsel was rejected by the trial court and he was directed to appear before the court. The appellant challenged the order of the Magistrate before the High Court by means of Miscellaneous Petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The High Court rejected the petition and refused to interfere with the order of the learned Magistrate. The appellant has challenged the order of the Magistrate and the High Court in the present appeal.

2. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties at some length, Mr. S. K. Puri, learned counsel appearing along with Mr. Rajinder Sachhar, stated on taking instructions, that the appellant doe



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top