SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(SC) 547

M.M.DUTT, RANGANATH MISRA
Rural Litigation And Entitlement Kendra, Dehradun – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
A.D.SANGAR, A.K.GANGULY, A.K.JAIN, A.K.PANDEY, A.K.SEN GUPTA, A.K.SRIVASTAVA, A.SUBBA RAO, A.Subhashini, ARUN JAITLEY, ARUNESHVAR GUPTA, ATUL TIVARI, B.D.AGRAWAL, Badri Das Sharma, BINA GUPTA, C.M.NAYAR, C.P.LAL, D.M.Nargolkar, D.N.Mishra, DEVI DITTA MAL, E.C.AGARWAL, G.A.SHAH, G.L.SANGHI, Harjinder Singh, INDERBIR SINGH, INDRA MAKWANA, K.K.JAIN, K.N.BHATT, K.R.NAGARAJA, K.R.NAMBIAR, KAPIL SIBAL, L.M.SINGHVI, M.A.KRISHNAMURTHY, M.G.RAMA CHANDRA RAO, M.K.RAMAMURTHY, M.KARANJAVALA, M.N.SHROFF, M.V.GOSWAMY, MILON BANERJI, N.N.KESHVANI, O.P.RANA, P.K.JAIN, P.KRISHNA RAO, P.P.JUNEJA, P.S.NARASIMHA, PARIJAT SINHA, PRAMOD DAYAL, R.B.MAHATO, R.K.JAIN, R.N.KESHWANI, R.P.Srivastava, R.S.HEGDE, RACHNA GUPTA, RAJINDER SACHAR, RAJU RAMACHANDRAN, RANJIT GHOSAL, RAVI P.VADHVANI, RAVI PRAKASH GUPTA, RISHI KESH, S.A.SYED, S.Atreya, S.C.GUPTA, S.K.JAIN, S.R.SHRIVASTAVA, S.S.Khanduja, SHOBHA DIXIT, Shri Narain, TAPAS RAY, V.C.MAHAJAN, YOGESHAR PRASAD

Judgment

RANGANATH MISRA, J.:- On July 14, 1983, a letter received from the Rural Litigation and Entitlement Kendera, Dehradun, bearing the date July 2, 1983, was directed to be registered as a writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution and notice was ordered to the State of Uttar Pradesh and the Collector of Dehradun. Allegations of unauthorised and illegal mining in the Mussoorie - Dehradun belt which adversely affected the ecology of the area and led to environmental disorder were made. Later on another application with similar allegations was directed to be tagged with the earlier one. That is how these two writ petitions were born in the registry of this Court in a very innocuous manner as public interest litigation. The number of parties inflated both under the orders of the Court and on application to be added. Apart from the Governments of the Union and of Uttar Pradesh, several governmental agencies and mining lessees appeared in the proceedings. What initially appeared to be two simple applications for limited relief got expanded into a comprehensive litigation requiring appointment of committees, inspection and reports in them from time to time, serious exercises




































































































































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top