SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(SC) 624

B.C.RAY, M.P.THAKKAR
Gurnek Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent


Advocates:
C.M.NAYAR, FRANK ANTHONY, R.C.Kohli, R.S.Suri

Judgment

THAKKAR, J. :- The trial court held and the High Court concurred, that appellants were the culprits who had fired at and injured Gurdarshan Singh (who succumbed to his injuries) as also his father, brother and mother (injured eye-witnesses PWs. 8, 9 and 10). The appellants have assailed the said finding and the order of conviction and sentence for the murder of Gurdarshan Singh and the attempt to commit the murder of PWs. 8, 9 and 10.*1

* 1.For the former offence appellants are convicted under S. 302 read with S. 34 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to imprisonment for life.

For the latter they have been convicted under S. 307 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to undergo rigourous imprisonment for 4 years.

2. The occurrence took place on Oct. 13, 1972 at about 7.00 p.m. near the haveli of the victims and near the house of appellant No. 1 Gurnek Singh which adjoins the said haveli. The appellants had fire arms with them and they had fired at the victims from the roof of their house. Deceased Gurdarshan Singh and the three injured eye-witnesses viz. PWs. 8, 9 and 10, namely, the father, brother and mother of Gurdarshan Singh were hit by pellets and injured in the cours























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top