SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(SC) 147

L.M.SHARMA, S.R.PANDIAN
State Of Maharashtra – Appellant
Versus
Salem Hasan Khan – Respondent


Advocates:
A.M.KHANWILKAR, JAYASHRI AHMED, Mohan Pandey, SYED ALI AHAMED, TANVIR AHMAD

JUDGMENT: — Special leave granted.

2. The respondent was served with an externment order passed under S. 56 of the Bombay Police Act (hereinafter referred to as the Act) directing him to leave the districts of Aurangabad and Jalna for a period of two Years. The order stated that from 11-5-1980 the respondent was found to be frequently engaged in illegal business of narcotics and since he was involved in several cases of riot and criminal intimidation causing physical hurts to the residents of the locality on account of his suspicion that they were supplying information to the police about his illegal activities, witnesses were not willing to come forward and depose against him. He filed an appeal under S. 60 of the Act and while the appeal was pending he moved the Bombay High Court with a writ application under Art. 226 of the Constitution. During the pendency of the writ application the State Government dismissed, the respondents appeal by a short order. The writ petitioner thereafter challenged the appellate order also in the pending writ case.

3. At the time of the final hearing of the writ case before the High Court, four points were raised on behalf of the petitioner. As the fir







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top