SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(SC) 539

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
E.S. VENKATARAMIAH, S. NATARAJAN AND N.D. OJHA, JJ.
P. and T. Scheduled Caste/Tribe Employees Welfare Association (Regd.) and others, Petitioners
Versus
Union of India and others, Respondents.
Writ Petn. (Civil) Nos. 1003-1005 of 1984
Decided on 29-8-1988.

Advocates:
A.Subhashini, AMAN VACHHER, C.V.SUBBA RAO, Dhruv Mehta, GIRISH CHANDRA, Jagannath Gokhlay, P.K.JAIN, PANKAJ KAIRA, R.K.GARG, S.K.MEHTA, S.M.Sarin, V.C.MAHAJAN

Headnote:

Constitution of India,1950 – Article 46,15(1),29(2),16(4),334,335,140(4),330 and 332 - Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes – Discrimination - People belonging to Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes and to other weaker sections of society in India are zealously protected children of Indian Constitution - Article 46 of the Constitution provides that the State shall promote with special care educational and economic interests of weaker sections of people and in particular of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes, and shall protect them from social injustice and all forms of exploitation - While clause (1) of Article 15 of the Constitution provides that State shall not discriminate against any citizen on grounds only of religion, race, caste, sex, place of birth or any of them, clause (4) of that Article provides that nothing in the said Article or in clause (2) of Article 29 of Constitution shall prevent State from making any special provision for advancement of any socially and educationally backward classes of citizens or for the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes - Whether an employee belonged to general category or to category of Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes he would be able to get promotion to higher cadre on completion of 16 years -Held, claim for conferment of some extra advantage on the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes employees working in the Posts & Telegraphs Department which may be commensurate with the extra advantage which members belonging to the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes are enjoying in other departments of the Government of India without detriment to the maintenance of efficiency in service appears to be a reasonable one - In what way it should be done is a matter left to discretion of the Government - This should be decided by the Government taking into consideration all aspects of the case - Court therefore, issue a direction to Government of India to issue an order under clause 6 of the letter conferring some additional advantage on the employees belonging to the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes in the Posts & Telegraphs Department commensurate with similar advantages which are being enjoyed by the employees belonging to Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes in other departments of the Government of India - Government shall issue such an order accordingly within four months from today - Any order that may be sued by the Government shall operate prospectively - All promotions that have been made so far pursuant to the policy contained in the letter and that may be made hereafter till the date on which the direction to be issued by Government under clause 6 comes into operation, shall however remain undisturbed - Petition allowed.

Judgement Key Points

Key Points: - The Court held that the government should issue an order under clause 6 to confer additional advantage on SC/ST in the Posts & Telegraphs Department, commensurate with advantages in other departments, within four months; such orders to operate prospectively (!) . - Before 30-11-1983, SC/ST employees in P&T enjoyed an extra promotion advantage under earlier reservation schemes; the 1983 policy shifted to a uniform 16-year promotion rule for all, removing the prior SC/ST advantage (!) (!) . - The Court found that deprivation of the SC/ST advantage compared to other departments violated equality, and directed judicial intervention to restore or provide equivalent advantage (!) . - The petition was allowed; promotions already made under the 23-12-1983 policy and those made up to the date of the Court’s direction would remain undisturbed; future promotions would follow the new directive (!) (!) . - The decision recognizes that any method to confer extra advantage to SC/ST (shorter service requirement, or other mechanisms) is within Government discretion and should be decided with regard to all aspects of the case (!) . - The petitioners sought a direction to issue specific orders enabling SC/ST personnel to gain comparable advantages to those in other departments; the Court accepted this grievance and granted the remedy (!) .

What is the entitlement of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes employees in promotions under time-bound promotion schemes?

What is the remedy or direction issued by the Court regarding reservation/advantage for SC/ST in Posts & Telegraphs Department?

What is the impact of withdrawing earlier reservation policies on the rights of SC/ST employees and how should the Government respond?


JUDGMENT

VENKATARAMIAH, J.:— People belonging to the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes and to other weaker sections of society in India are the zealously protected children of the Indian Constitution. Article 46 of the Constitution provides that the State shall promote with special care the educational and economic interests of the weaker sections of the people, and, in particular, of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes, and shall protect them from social injustice and all forms of exploitation. While clause (1) of Article 15 of the Constitution provides that the State shall not discriminate against any citizen on grounds only of religion, race, caste, sex, place of birth or any of them, clause (4) of that Article provides that nothing in the said Article or in clause (2) of Article 29 of the Constitution shall prevent the State from making any special provision for the advancement of any socially and educationally backward classes of citizens or for the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes. Similarly, while clause (1) of Article 16 of the Constitution provides that there shall be equality of opportunity for all citizens in matters relating to employment or appointment to any office under the State and clause (2) of the said Article provides that no citizen shall, on grounds only of religion, race, caste, sex, descent, place of birth, residence or any of them, be ineligible for, or discriminated against in respect of any employment or office under the State, clause 140 (4) of the said Article provides that nothing in that Article shall prevent the State from making any provision for the reservation of appointments or posts in favour of any backward class of citizens which, in the opinion of the State, is not adequately represented in the services under the State. Article 330 and Article 332 of the Constitution provide for reservation of seats for the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes in the Lok Sabha and in the Legislative Assemblies of the States till such period as is provided in Article 334 of the Constitution. Article 335 of the Constitution, which is relevant for purposes of this case, provides that the claims of the members of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes shall be taken into consideration, consistently with the maintenance of efficiency of administration, in the making of appointments to services and posts in connection with the affairs of the Union or of a State.

2. The present case is, however, one in which a concession which had been extended to the employees belonging to the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes by way of reservation of vacancies at the stage of promotion has been withdrawn in a rather concealed way. Petitioners 1 and 2 in this Writ Petition are the P & T Scheduled Caste/Tribe Employees Welfare Association (Regd), Delhi and the Federation of All India Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes, Employees P & T Department, New Delhi and petitioner 3 is an employee in the Posts & Telegraphs Department. By the letter bearing No. 27/2/71-Estt. (SCT) dated 27-11-1972 issued by the Department of Personnel, the Government communicated its policy regarding the reservations for the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes in posts filled by promotion/promotions on the basis of seniority subject to fitness. The said policy was adopted by the Government in supersession of the orders contained in an earlier Government Order dated 11-7-1968. Under the said policy a reservation of 15 per cent of vacancies was made for the Scheduled Castes and 7-1/2 per cent for the Scheduled Tribes wherever promotions were to be made on the basis of seniority subject to fitness, in appointments to all Class I, Class II, Class III and Class IV posts in grades or services in which the element of direct recruitment, if any, did not exceed 50 per cent. In order to implement the above reservation the Government directed the appointing authorities to maintain a separate 40-point roster to det








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top