SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(SC) 210

K.JAGANNATHA SHETTY, K.N.SAIKIA
Sumati P. Shere – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent


Advocates:
G.B.SETHI, G.RAMASVAMY, P.P.SINGH, SUSHMA SURI

JUDGMENT

K. JAGANNATHA SHETTY, J. : — We grant special leave and proceed to dispose of the appeal.

2. There was a permanent post of Assistant Surgeon Grade I in the Naval Headquarters. On 16 February, 1982, the appellant, Dr. (Mrs.) Sumati Prakash Shere was appointed in that post. The Order of appointment stated that the appointment was on ad hoc basis for a period of six months or till a regular candidate from the Union Public Service Commission became available whichever was earlier. The appellant. however, was continued in service by giving her successive extensions from time to time. The last of such extension was up to 15 February, 1985. But by a letter dated 12 January, 1985, the Headquarter Officer of the Western Naval Command informed her that her services would stand terminated with effect from 15 February, 1985. She, moved the High Court of Bombay with writ petition No. 304 of 1985 challenging the said order. Upon constitution of the Central Administrative Tribunal, the said writ petition stood transferred to the Bombay Bench of that Tribunal.

3. The Tribunal in the course of hearing of the case perused the confidential file relating to the appellant. There it was said to h







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top