SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(SC) 277

L. M. SHARMA, N. D. OJHA, R. S. PATHAK
Member, Board Of Revenue, W. B. – Appellant
Versus
Controller Of Stores, Eastern Railway, Calcutta – Respondent


Advocates:
C.V.SUBBA RAO, D.N.DEVEDI, D.N.MUKHERJI, G.S.CHATTERJEE

JUDGMENT

PATHAK, CJI. : — The question raised in these two appeals is whether the assessee Railway in each appeal is a "dealer" within the meaning of the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941 and therefore liable to assessment under that Act.

2. In C. A. No. 845 of 1974 the facts are these.

The assessee South Eastern Railway disposes of unclaimed and unconnected goods for money consideration. On 1 April, 1952 the assessee applied for registration as a dealer under the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act in respect of unconnected or unclaimed goods, and was accordingly registered. It submitted returns of sales effected by it of unclaimed and unconnected goods year after year and paid sales tax pursuant to the assessments made by the Sales Tax department. However, in assessment proceedings for the four quarters ending March, 1959 the assessee applied to the Commercial Tax Officer for cancellation of the registration of the assessee as a "dealer" under the Act. The Commercial Tax Officer examined the case and did not accept the contention that the assessee was not a "dealer". On 6 June, 1959 he made an order rejecting the application on the basis that the disposal of unclaimed goods for valua











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top