SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(SC) 249

A.M.AHMADI, S.NATARAJAN
Pramod Mahto – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
A.K.SEN GUPTA, M.P.Jha, PRAMOD SVARUP

JUDGMENT

NATARAJAN, J.:— After hearing learned counsel for the parties, we grant special leave confined to the question of sentence only.

2. The appellants have been convicted under section 376 IPC and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and also to pay a fine of Rs. 1,000/- in default to undergo RI for two years. The four appellants who were arrayed as A2, A3, A4 and Al will hereafter be referred to in the order of their array before the Sessions Judge.

3. The four appellants and one Umesh Mahto (accused No. 5) besides 11 others who were acquitted were charged under Sections 380 and 376 read with Section 149 IPC for having entered the house of the victims and committing rape on them and thereafter removing cash and valuables from the house on the night of 16/17 of March, 1984. The prosecution case was that while accused Nos. 6 to 16 stood outside the house, accused Nos. 1 to 5 entered the house through the roof after dismantling a portion of it and thereafter accused Nos. 1 to 4 committed rape on the victims while accused No. 5 stood guard over them with a gun in his hands in order to overawe them and make them submit to the rape committed on them without protest. Accused Nos












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top