SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(SC) 353

S.NATARAJAN, KULDIP SINGH, G.L.OZA
Navtej Singh – Appellant
Versus
Satish Kumar Khurana – Respondent


Advocates:
N.S.DAS BEHL, SATISH KUMAR AGRAWAL

JUDGMENT

NATARAJAN, J. :— This appeal by special leave arises from an order of the Disciplinery Committee of the Bar Council of India directing the suspension of practice of the appellant Navtej Singh for a period of one year for professional misconduct and also directing him to return a sum of Rs. 1,900/- received by him from the first respondent towards professional services. Before filing the appeal, the appellant had unsuccessfully sought for a review of the order and on the dismissal of the review petition, he has filed. this appeal.

2. The first respondent laid a complaint before the Bar Council of India against the appellant alleging professional misconduct and misappropriation of a sum of Rs. 1,900/ given by him towards the filing of a suit against Messrs. Roneo Vickers (India) Ltd. The first respondents case was that since he had engaged the appellant to act as his advocate in certain earlier legal proceedings, he requested him to file a suit against Messrs. Roneo Vickers ( India) Ltd. for recovery of a sum of Rs. 17,474.50 p., and gave him all the relevant papers for the filing of the suit. The appellant-made certain calculations and said that a sum of Rs. 1,906/- would be



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top