SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
M.M. DUTT AND KULDIP SINGH, JJ.
Pyare Lal Sharma, Appellant
Versus
Managing Director, Jammu and Kashmir Industries Ltd. And others, Respondents.
Civil Appeals Nos. 3154 and 3155 of 1985, (with C.M.P. No. 1213/88)
Decided on 19-7-1989.
AND
Managing Director, Jammu and Kashmir Industries Ltd., Srinagar, Appellant
Versus
Pyare Lal Sharma Respondent.
Constitution of India,1950 – Article 14 and 311(1) – Transfer – Termination - Various reliefs - One joined company as Assistant Chemical Engineer - He was sent to England as management trainee but he returned back without completing training – Said one conflict with company started when he filed a suit against company in High Court with various reliefs including a direction that he be again sent to England at companys expense - He then filed another suit in the Delhi High Court claiming sum as damages from company but same did not proceed on technical grounds - Thereafter, it said one started suspecting mala fide in every action of company and resorted to court proceedings even on slight pretext - He challenged the order of transfer to the headquarters by way of suit in High Court - Interim stay, initially granted, was vacated by High Court - He applied for leave on medical grounds without disclosing ailment - He remained absent without any sanctioned leave - Disciplinary proceedings were initiated against him on charge of unauthorised absence and he was placed under suspension - He filed Writ Petition High Court against suspension - Ultimately Said one expressed regrets and he was reinstated into service by an order - He was transferred from headquarters to one of the units - He again filed a writ petition in High Court challenging the order of transfer - Whether Regulation 16.14 is arbitrary and as such ultra vires Article 14 of the Constitution of India – Held, services of person could not be terminated on ground of unauthorised absence from duty under Regulation, then it is wholly illegal to make the absence during that period as aground for terminating the services of said one - It is basic principle of natural justice that no one can be penalised on ground of a conduct which was not penal on the day it was committed - Date of show cause notice being unauthorised absence from duty which has been taken into consideration - Whole of this period being prior to date of amendment of regulation same could not be made as a ground for proceeding under ground (c) of Regulation 16.14 - Notice served on appellant was thus illegal and as a consequence order of termination cannot be sustained and has to be set aside - When the termination order is set aside by courts normally the servant becomes entitled to backwages and other consequential benefits - This case has a chequered history - Facts which court have narrated above go to show that Sharma has equally contributed to this unfortunate situation - In view of facts and circumstances of this case we order that sixty per cent of the back-wages be paid - Money already received by said one under orders of this Court or High Court shall be adjusted and the balance paid to him - It the money already paid is more than what court have ordered then there shall be no recovery from him - Civil Appeal is allowed to the extent indicated above, Civil Appeal filed by company is dismissed - Order accordingly.
JUDGMENT
KULDIP SINGH, J. :— Jammu & Kashmir Industries Limited (hereinafter called company ) is a company registered under the Indian Companies Act, 1956 and is wholly owned and managed by the State of Jammu & Kashmir. Pyare Lal Sharma was employed by the company as Chemical Engineer. His services were terminated by the Managing Director of the company on June 14, 1983. Sharmas writ petition was allowed by a learned single Judge of the Jammu & Kashmir High Court. On appeal by the company the Letters Patent Bench upheld the judgment but denied backwages to Sharma. This is how these two appeals, one by the company and the other by Sharma, are before us.
2. We may briefly notice the necessary facts. Pyare Lal Sharma joined the company as Assistant Chemical Engineer on July 12, 1972. In 1974 he was sent to England as management trainee but he returned back without completing the training. Sharmas conflict with the company started in 1976 when he filed a suit against the company in Jammu & Kashmir High Court with various reliefs including a direction that he be again sent to England at companys expense. The suit was dismissed and further appeal to the Division Bench was also dismissed. He then filed another suit in the Delhi High Court claiming Rs. 50 lakhs as damages from the company but the same did not proceed on technical grounds. Thereafter, it seems, Sharma started suspecting mala fide in every action of the company and resorted to court proceedings even on slight pretext. He challenged the order of transfer from Baramulla to the headquarters by way of suit in the Jammu & Kashmir High Court. Interim stay, initially granted, was vacated by the High Court. In December, 1979 he applied for leave on medical grounds without disclosing the ailment. He remained absent from December 7, 1979 to March 7, 1980 without any sanctioned leave. Disciplinary proceedings were initiated against him on the charge of unauthorised absence and he was placed under suspension on March 8, 1980. He filed Writ Petition No. 58/80 in the Jammu & Kashmir High Court against suspension. Ultimately Sharma expressed regrets and he was reinstated into service by an order dated May 15, 1980. In April, 1981 he was transferred from headquarters to one of the units. He again filed a writ petition in the Jammu & Kashmir High Court challenging the order of transfer but the same was dismissed. Thereafter he filed Writ Petition No. 4086 of 1982 in this Court which was heard by Chinnappa Reddy, J. (Vacation Judge) on 1st of June, 1982. The learned Judge passed the following order :
"Issue notice returnable on June 15, 1982. Notice be also served on the counsel for the State of Jammu & Kashmir Mr. Altaf Ahmad. Mr. Altaf Ahmad will take instructions from his clients and assist this Court to know the precise facts of the case which it is impossible to find from the petitioner. I have suggested to the petitioner that he may engage a counsel but he does not appear to be inclined to do so. Nor is he willing to be assisted by the counsel engaged by this court."
3. The writ petition was, however, dismissed as withdrawn on June 15, 1982. Sharma filed two more writ petitions being 293 of 1982 and 410 of 1982 in the Jammu & Kashmir High Court challenging the promotions of some other officers.
4. Sharma absented from duty on September 8, 1982. He was asked to explain his absence. A para out of his reply is as under:
"I have been submitting charge-sheets against you since last one year to authorities about your corrupt practices, communal character, and illegal financial advancement you have made but no action has been taken against you since you utilise political pressure and bribed the chairman."
5. Sharma was served with a charge-sheet dated September 24, 1982 and he was placed under suspension. Use of derogatory language in various communications was one of the charges against him. He submitted his reply to the charge-sheet on October 7, 1982. Part of the opening paragraph is as unde
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.