SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(SC) 424

K.JAGANNATHA SHETTY, M.N.VENKATACHALIAH
Sushma Gosain – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent


Advocates:
B.DUTTA, C.RAMAMURTHY, HEMANT SHARMA, SUSHMA SURI

JUDGMENT

K. JAGANNATHA-SHETTY, J. :— Special leave granted.

2. We must first express our disapproval of the way in which the department of Director General Border Road ("DGBR") has behaved in this pitiable case.

3. Ram Kumar was working as Storekeeper in the Department of Director General Border Road (DGBR). In October 1982, he died in harness leaving behind the appellants. Appellant No. 1 Sushma Gosain appellants is his widow and appellants Nos. 2 and 3 are their minor children.

4. In November 1982, Sushma Gosain sought appointment in DGBR as lower Division Clerk on compassionate grounds. In January 1983, she was called for the written test and later on for interview. She was said to have passed the trade test. But nonetheless she was not appointed. Whenever she approached DGBR, she was told that her case was under consideration.

5. In September 1985, Sushma Gosain filed writ petition in the High Court of Delhi for a direction against DGBR to appoint her in a suitable post. She was entitled to appointment in terms of Government Memorandum O.M.No. 14034/l/77/Estt. (d) dated 25-11-1978 issued by the Ministry of Home Affairs. DGBR however, resisted the writ petition with a primary conten















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top