SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(SC) 414

S.R.PANDIAN, K.JAGANNATHA SHETTY
Sham Sunder – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent


Advocates:
G.K.BANSAL, M.C.BHANDARE, Mahabir Singh

JUDGMENT

K. JAGANNATHA SHETTY, J.:— We grant special leave and proceed to dispose of this appeal.

2. On June 28,1980 the appellants formed a partnership firm for the purpose of running a rice mill in the name and style of M/s Patina Lal Prem Nath Rice Mills at Shahpur. They have been convicted by the Presiding Officer of the Special Court, Karnal by judgment dated March 110, 1986 for contravention of the provisions of the Haryana Rice Procurement (Levy) Order, 1979, read with section 7 of the Essential Commodities Act. They were sentenced to six months rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 2,000/- each. The High Court of Punjab & Haryana has confirmed that conviction and sentence.

They now appeal against conviction.

3. The facts which gave rise to the. charges, in so far as material, were these: In 1984, the firm purchased 5373 quintals 69 kgs. and 400 gms of common paddy from the market. At the rate of conversion of paddy into rice an average 3582.49 quintals of rice should have been obtained from that much quantity of paddy. As per levy rules the firm ought to have supplied 3224.21 quintals of rice to the Government but the firm failed to supply it. Instead it supplied only 1510 q
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top